You are here

Activism & Organizing

Activism logo

RJ Matson | Health Care Is Complicated / media.cagle.com

http://media.cagle.com/73/2017/02/27/192228_600.jpg

Revolutionary Musings

http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/scalefit_720_noupscale/58b593912900002200beb66d.png

“Revolution” by Delano Dunn

Join the revolution!

Barbara Ransby, Huffington Post

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Twitter%20Logo%20%28512%29.jpgNow you can follow Evergreene Digest on Twitter.

 





02/28/2017 | Revolution! The word means different things to different people. It has been made seductive by the work of artists like Lin-Manuel Miranda, in his groundbreaking musical, Hamilton. Perhaps a more palatable “call for revolution” is Bernie Sanders’ new organization, Our Revolution, which asks Americans to “reclaim democracy for the working people of our country by harnessing the transformative energy of the ‘political revolution.’”

Invocations of revolution have long held a special place in the radical imagination of Black freedom struggles all over the world.

When I was a teenager growing up in Detroit in the 1960s and 70s, I thought we were on the verge, if not in the midst, of a revolution. 

Increasingly, I have come to view revolution as a process, not an event, as a journey, not a final destination. In fact, there is no ‘promised land’ in my revolutionary imagination, just a beautiful eternal promise that we make to one another (and to the planet) to fight with unrelenting passion for a more just, humane and sustainable world.

Barbara Ransby: Distinguished Professor of African American Studies, Gender and Women’s Studies, and History at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC)

Full story … 

Special Project | Welcome to the Revolution: Law and Order and the Last Great Strike in America ~ Ahmed White

 

http://prospect.org/sites/default/files/styles/longform_cover_image/public/ap955555990903_banner.jpeg?itok=wwDP-bNR

Described by University of California Press

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/I%20Want%20You.jpg If you like reading this article, consider joining the crew of all reader-supported Evergreene Digest by contributing the equivalent of a cafe latte a month--using the donation button above—so we can bring you more just like it.

 

 

 




 

February 17, 2017 | Several weeks into Donald Trump’s presidency, millions of Americans have skipped work, walked off their jobs, or otherwise demonstrated in protest of his policies. Many others are planning to do so in the weeks ahead. For those of us who study strikes and protests, these developments are at once thrilling and portentous, particularly in light of the peculiar place that strikes occupy in our country’s history. For most of American history since the late Nineteenth Century, it was quite a normal thing for people to go out on strike. In 1937, for instance, over 7 percent of American workers went out on strike; in 1946, that number reached 10 percent. Even as recently as 1970, almost six million men and women spent some time out on strike. But recently strikes have been exceedingly uncommon with only a handful each year. Even most union members have never been on strike.

http://content.ucpress.edu/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/9780520285613.jpgWhy are strikes so uncommon? The reasons are complicated, but one important thing stands out. The strikes of the 1930s and 1940s, especially, were extremely effective. They built the modern labor movement, upheld the New Deal against reactionary attacks, and ensured the foundations of the postwar political system. But precisely because they were so effective, the strikes were the targets of relentless counterattack by powerful business interests and their allies in government. At first, the dominant response to strikes in this period was a rather simple and venerable one. Strikes were considered presumptively illegitimate and often met with naked force, only crudely justified by law. Put into practice, this approach left probably 200 workers dead in the 1930s alone. However, later in that decade, even as some of the most violent strikes were still unfolding, the approach to strikes was rebuilt around the notion that, while the right was guaranteed by federal law and the U.S. Constitution, it was far from absolute and had to yield if strikers were violent or coercive. Although superficially reasonable, the real import of this new approach was to make the kinds of strikes that promised to be effective also the most costly for strikers and most likely to be found unlawful. And not because only disorderly strikes could be effective, but because even the anticipation of coercion or violence on the part of strikers was enough to justify arresting them, firing them, enjoining their picket lines, and using lawful force against them. Nor was the fact that strikers might have been provoked to act in these ways much of an excuse. The most notable example of this new approach can be found in one of the most tragic episodes in the history of protest: the 1937 “Little Steel” Strike, in which steel companies and their allies killed at least sixteen strikers in order to break a strike which they had caused, and yet paid almost no penalty for doing so. So it was that the repression of strikes was brought in line with modern notions of law and order.

Ahmed White is a Professor of Law at the University of Colorado, Boulder. His scholarship centers on the intersection of labor and criminal law and on the concept of rule of law.

Full story … 

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

Here’s How To Find The Town Hall Protest Near You This Week

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/People%20Power%20Banner%20at%20Ferguson%2C%20MO%2C%20City%20Hall.jpg

Activists have planned rallies at Republican lawmakers’ events around the country.

Kate Abbey-Lambertz, Huffington Post

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Raised%20Fist%20Power%20to%20the%20People.jpg 02/20/2017 | While Congress is in recess this week, the voters back home will be demanding answers from their representatives.

Activists have organized dozens of rallies targeting members of Congress at town hall meetings and other appearances, building on a wave of protests over the last month.

People can find events near them by checking the Resistance Recess site, a project of the progressive advocacy group MoveOn.org. The site calls on Americans to hold their representatives accountable for plans to repeal the Affordable Care Act and for supporting President Donald Trump.

Kate Abbey-Lambertz is a National Reporter for The Huffington Post. Based in Detroit, she covers sustainable cities, housing and inequality.

Full story … 

 http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

Can a Mass Movement Seize This Anti-Trump Moment?

http://workerscompass.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/rallyphoto.png

  • A revolutionary movement will radicalize millions of people, on top of the millions who’ve already been radicalized by the announcement of Trump’s victory. These newly-radicalized people just need a coalition of organizations to help lead them into struggle, and once the masses have entered the revolutionary road, anything is possible. The moment can be seized or squandered. It’s up to us. Time is short.
  • Can a Mass Movement Seize This Anti-Trump Moment?
  • Related: In the Name of Humanity, We Refuse To Accept a Fascist America.

Shamus Cooke, Workers Compass

Submitted by Evergreene Digest Contributing Editor John Stoltenberg <jpstolten@frontier.com>

November 22, 2016 | Change is in the air. Millions of people in the U.S. woke up to the living nightmare of a Trump presidency. The threat and shock posed by Trump jolted hundreds of thousands off their couch and into the street. People of all ages now want to “do something,” joining protests nationwide that the Washington Post called “a roiling movement across the country.”

Massive protests immediately followed the election results in just about every major city in the country, including an enormous demonstration in Los Angeles on November 12th that galvanized social media users nationwide to leave their computers and join the protests.

Shamus Cooke is a social service worker, trade unionist, and writer for Workers Action.  

Full story … 

Related: 

Can a Mass Movement Seize This Anti-Trump Moment? Shamus Cooke, Workers Compass

http://workerscompass.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/rallyphoto.png

  • A revolutionary movement will radicalize millions of people, on top of the millions who’ve already been radicalized by the announcement of Trump’s victory. These newly-radicalized people just need a coalition of organizations to help lead them into struggle, and once the masses have entered the revolutionary road, anything is possible. The moment can be seized or squandered. It’s up to us. Time is short.
  • Related: In the Name of Humanity, We Refuse To Accept a Fascist America.

###

In the Name of Humanity, We Refuse To Accept a Fascist America, Revolution Newspaper

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Welcome%20To%20the%20Revolution%20logo.jpg

  • Rise Up... Get Into The Streets... Unite With People Everywhere to Build Up Resistance in Every Way You Can.
  • Don’t Stop: Don’t Conciliate... Don’t Accommodate...Don’t Collaborate
  • Related: 'People Have the Right to Take to the Streets'

  http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

Pages