You are here

Books, Literature & Ideas

Books, Literature & Ideas

Be Wary Of The Democratic Wing Of The Protest Movement

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Politics%20Banner.jpg

  • The self-labeled "Progressive Movement" that has arisen over the past decade is primarily one big propaganda campaign serving the political interests of the the Democratic Party’s richest one-percent who created it.  The funders and owners of the Progressive Movement get richer and richer off Wall Street and the corporate system.  But they happen to be Democrats, cultural and social liberals who can’t stomach Republican policies, and so after bruising electoral defeats a decade ago they decided to buy a movement, one just like the Republicans, a copy.
  • Related: Progressives Need A New Party, Not A New DNC Chair

John Stauber, CounterPunch / Popular Resistance

https://popularresistance-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2017/02/trump_donald_getty_11-e1486045708517.jpg Above Photo: From thehill.com

February 14th, 2017 | There is good news in the Boston Globe today for the managers, development directors, visionaries, political hacks and propaganda flacks who run “the Progressive Movement.”   More easy-to-earn and easy-to-hide soft money, millions of dollars,  will be flowing to them from super rich Democrats and business corporations.  It will come clean, pressed and laundered through Organizing for Action, the latest incarnation of the Obama Money Machine which has recently morphed into a “nonpartisan non-profit corporation” that will  ‘‘strengthen the progressive movement and train our next generation of leaders.’’

Does this information concern you?  If not, you need to get out of the propaganda bubble of your Progressive Movement echo chamber and think.  Think hard.  Think about fundamental, radical, democratic, social and economic change, who might bring it about and how.  Ask yourself if the the rich elite, the 1%, are going to fund that.   Leave The Nation and Mother Jones on the shelf;  turn off Ed Schultz, Rachel Madow and Chris Hayes;  don’t open that barrage of email missives from Alternet, Media Matters, MoveOn, and the other think tanks;  and get your head out of the liberal blogosphere for a couple days.  Clear your mind and consider this.

John Stauber is an independent writer, activist and author.  His books include Toxic Sludge Is Good for You, Mad Cow USA and Weapons of Mass Deception.  In 1993 he founded the Center for Media and Democracy to exposed corporate, political and media propaganda campaigns.  

Full story … 

Related: 

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/If%20You%20Ise%20it%2C%20Contribute%20To%20It%20banner.jpg

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/No%20Republicrats.jpgProgressives Need A New Party, Not A New DNC Chair, Jonathan H. Martin, Huffington Post

  • The DNC election … should challenge … progressives to ask themselves how long they will continue sailing on the U.S.S. Democrat. That ship is not headed toward the desired destination, nor is it even designed to go there. Moreover, in the wake of the 2016 election, it is a boat that appears to be rotting, drifting, and gradually sinking. Why not jump aboard a different vessel, one that really has the potential to get us where we urgently need to go?
  • Related: Series | 2016 General Election Guide, Part 1: The Left Has Lost Its Nerve and Direction

Full story ... 

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

 

Field of Fright

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Politics%20Banner.jpg

  • The Terror Inside Trump’s White House
  • Related: Paul Krugman Issues a Warning About What We All Know Is Coming

Ira Chernus, Tom Dispatch

http://www.greanvillepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/26063070824_e941dbc3d9_b_trump-clinton-768x768.jpg February 5, 2017 | What kind of national security policy will the Trump administration pursue globally? On this issue, as on so many others, the incoming president has offered enough contradictory clues, tweets, and comments that the only definitive answer right now is: Who knows?

During his presidential campaign he more or less promised a non-interventionist foreign policy, even as he offered hints that his might be anything but.  There was, of course, ISIS to destroy and he swore he would “bomb the shit out of them.” He would, he suggested, even consider using nuclear weapons in the Middle East.  And as Dr. Seuss might have said, that was not all, oh no, that was not all.  He has often warned of the dangers of a vague but fearsome “radical Islam” and insisted that “terrorists and their regional and worldwide networks must be eradicated from the face of the Earth, a mission we will carry out.”  (And he’s already ordered his first special ops raid in Yemen, resulting in one dead American and evidently many dead civilians.)

Ira Chernus, a TomDispatch regular, is professor emeritus of religious studies at the University of Colorado at Boulder and author of the online MythicAmerica: Essays.

Full story … 

Related:

http://www.evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/twitter-4-512.png Now you can follow Evergreene Digest on Twitter.

 

 



http://media.salon.com/2014/07/torn_flag-620x412.jpg

(Credit: Reuters/Richard Rowe)

Paul Krugman Issues a Warning About What We All Know Is Coming, Dartagnan, DailyKos / AlterNet

The New York Times columnist sees calamity on the horizon for Trump's America.

Full story ... 

 

Paul Krugman Issues a Warning About What We All Know Is Coming

http://media.salon.com/2014/07/torn_flag-620x412.jpg

(Credit: Reuters/Richard Rowe)

The New York Times columnist sees calamity on the horizon for Trump's America.

Dartagnan, DailyKos / AlterNet

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Reader%20Supported%20News%20donate%20graphic.jpg If you like reading this article, consider joining the crew of all reader-supported Evergreene Digest by contributing the equivalent of a cafe latte a month--using the donation button in the above right-hand corner—so we can bring you more just like it.

http://www.alternet.org/files/styles/story_image/public/story_images/5664031706_ba464bd004_z.jpg February 11, 2017 | In September of 2001 the Administration of George W. Bush was running into trouble. A President who had lost the popular vote, installed into office only through a hotly contested Supreme Court decision, had nonetheless behaved from the start as if he possessed a mandate, eagerly dismantling his predecessor’s achievements and turning the country on a hard rightward course, following a strategy that had been carefully concealed from the public during the campaign.

The public reaction was swift and negative—Bush’s own popularity tanked precipitously as the public reacted to an agenda most had not realized they had voted for. Prior to September 11th his approval levels had dropped to the lowest of his still-young Presidency.

Dartagnan, Member, DailyKos

 

Full story … 

 

 

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

 

 

Pages