You are here

Books & Liturature

Monte Wolverton | Haunted Pontiff / www.truthdig.com

Section(s): 

Why Are Democrats So Defeatist?

Their failure to dislodge Speaker John Boehner and majority leader Eric Cantor assures that President Obama and congressional Democrats will get very little done for the next two years. 

Ralph Nader, Nation 

Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

The Republicans are openly introspective about why they failed to regain the presidency and the Senate. It is time for the same kind of rigorous self-analysis by the Democrats, who floated through their failure to regain control of the House without apparent dismay. Their failure to dislodge Speaker John Boehner and majority leader Eric Cantor assures that President Obama and congressional Democrats will get very little done for the next two years. 

In the last Congress, Democrats were up against the cruelest, most extremist, most corporate-controlled Republican Party in history—a party far too extreme for the likes of Senator Robert Taft or Ronald Reagan. Last fall, the House Democratic Caucus issued a list of sixty outrageous Republican votes. If these bills had not been blocked in the Senate, the legislation would have been very unpopular with most voters.

Full story...

Series | Socialism: Theory & Practice, Part 2, Sidney J. Gluck

  • Capitalism is a "dog-eat-dog" system based upon the exploitation of working people. Socialism is a cooperative alternative to capitalism. The corporate media distorts socialism just as it lies about almost everything else in order to keep working people confused and disoriented. Solving our problems requires understanding socialism. Socialists understand the key to creating a better world is through: Education, Organization, Unity, & Action
  • Part 2: An Open Letter to President Barack Obama from Sidney J. Gluck

Sidney J. Gluck, Socialism Theory and Practice

I don't know whether you agree with my point of view or not; but I am functioning out of the feeling that the negative aspects of capitalism are becoming obvious to people all around the world regardless of class positions, that understanding its avaricious nature brings them closer to Marx's analysis of the system which all of you can read his seminal word on "Capital." Chapter 26 which deals with the law of capitalist accumulation will give you the prototype of which the USA's capitalism is the arch example of its worst (together with the British who started out but are following along with the USA).

Globalization is a mess and everyone knows that the USA has created more poverty with its capital investments than existed before the global expansion. We know that formal colonial countries are seeing through this domination and are moving in directions which reject the control of foreign capital in their own developments. We are living in a century of epochal change. Our hope is that the change which is now developing in the form of a bipolar economic structure will continue to redevelop economies technologically and sustainably. We hope too that the ultimate resolution of differences between the double-structured world economic system will not be resolved by warfare. That is the most important struggle we must be involved with. A peaceful acceptance of epochal change and the survival of all in a better world.

Full story...

Related:

Part 1: Albert Einstein, Why Socialism? Albert Einstein, Socialism Theory and Practice

Is it advisable for one who is not an expert on economic and social issues to express views on the subject of socialism? I believe for a number of reasons that it is.

 

 

A New Pope Won't Save The Sinking Ship

  • It would take nothing short of a miracle to avert failure for the next Pope and a crisis of faith for believers. Here are four reasons why the next Pope will be met with nearly insurmountable challenges, no matter how talented or charismatic.
  • Scandal Spectacle: The 10 Most Corrupt and Compromised Cardinals Voting For the New Pope

Wayne Besen, Truth Wins Out

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to all-reader supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button in the above right-hand corner—so we can bring you more just like it.

As the College of Cardinals slinks into Rome to elect a new Pope, the usual chorus of eternal optimists and media  lapdogs follow close behind. The secular press is ecstatic because they can pose as pious while lifting sagging newspaper sales and static cable ratings. Beaten down progressive Catholics will do their predictable dupe dance, hoping against all odds that an almost modern pontiff will be elevated to the throne.

Of course, we already know the outcome, given that the last two Popes stocked the pool of bishops and cardinals with ideological clones, ensuring conservative continuity. If this weren't bad enough, the former Pope will be looking over the new boss' shoulder and has even installed his live-in "personal assistant," to serve the Pope-elect, guaranteeing he has eyes and ears inside the Vatican.

But even if my dire assessment were completely off base, it would take nothing short of a miracle to avert failure for the next Pope and a crisis of faith for believers. Here are four reasons why the next Pope will be met with nearly insurmountable challenges, no matter how talented or charismatic.

Full story...

Related:

Scandal Spectacle: The 10 Most Corrupt and Compromised Cardinals Voting For the New Pope, Adele M. Stan, AlterNet

  • While the world cries for the church to reform itself, the next pope's electors include cardinals who coddled priests who preyed on children.
  • UK Cardinal O'Brien Steps Down; Won't Attend Conclave
  • Roman Church admits the Pope's Guilt
  • Why the Cardinal Mahony scandal matters

 

 

The Ignorance Caucus

For all the talk of reforming and reinventing the G.O.P., the ignorance caucus retains a firm grip on the party’s heart and mind.

Paul Krugman, New York (NY) Times

At a time when corporations are buying up elections - not to mention the 24-hour news cycle - help ensure that a source for truly independent journalism lives on. Support all reader supported Evergreene Digest today by using the donation button in the above right-hand corner. 

Paul Krugman / Fred R. Conrad / New York Times

Last week Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, gave what his office told us would be a major policy speech. And we should be grateful for the heads-up about the speech’s majorness. Otherwise, a read of the speech might have suggested that he was offering nothing more than a meager, warmed-over selection of stale ideas.

To be sure, Mr. Cantor tried to sound interested in serious policy discussion. But he didn’t succeed — and that was no accident. For these days his party dislikes the whole idea of applying critical thinking and evidence to policy questions. And no, that’s not a caricature: Last year the Texas G.O.P. explicitly condemned efforts to teach “critical thinking skills,” because, it said, such efforts “have the purpose of challenging the student’s fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority.” [Evergreene Digest Editor's Note: Molly Ivins once said that, if a member of the Texas legislature lost any more IQ points, "We'll have to put him in a flower pot and water him twice a week."]

Full story...

*I do not #StandWithRand

  • I don’t support partisan political grandstanding and that’s what his stunt was, and that’s all. Of course, Rand Paul supports the use of drones to kill brown Arabs in other countries and “enemy combatants” here in the US and he also hypocritically voted for the National Defense Authorization Act 2013.
  • Cliffs Notes for the Filibuster: Rand Paul in His Own Words

Cindy Sheehan, Cindy Sheehan's Soapbox

This article is made possible with the generous contributions of all reader supported Evergreene Digest readers like you. Thank you!

Friday, March 8, 2013 | True story: when I was camping near George Bush’s fake ranch in Crawford, Tx, I got a message of solidarity and support from KKK Grand Wizard, David Duke. I immediately denounced it and refused the support.

Recently an obvious political stunt was perpetrated by one of the members of the most exclusive group of one-percent jackasses on the planet, the US Senate, and some very shady and harmful thugs are supporting him in it and I would denounce that kind of support if it were me.

Full story...

Related:

Cliffs Notes for the Filibuster: Rand Paul in His Own Words, Conor Friedersdorf, Atlantic

  • The Kentucky Republican's nearly 13-hour stand on the Senate floor, condensed into a tight brief for civil liberties
  • Obama's Drone Presidency
 

Yes, The Alternative is Democratic Socialism

  • Democratic socialists favor the extension of democracy into the realm of the economy. And we do not take the recurrent cycles of capitalist boom and bust for granted, accompanied by erosion of civil liberties at home and by imperial adventures abroad.
  • Viral Video Shows the Extent of U.S. Wealth Inequality
  • Series | Socialism: Theory & Practice, Part 1

Scott Tucker, Socialist Webzine

Submitted by Evergreene Digest Contributing Editor John Stoltenberg

 

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to all reader-supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button above—so we can bring you more just like it.

 

Watch:The Staggering Extent of Wealth Inequality of America 

 

At a recent meeting of the Socialist Party, I showed an old fashioned fold out printed graph of wealth distribution in the United States in the late 1970s. The middle class was already shrinking fast in those years. In the decades since, class divisions have only deepened at an ever faster rate. The working class has been pauperized, the middle class has been proletarianized, and the ruling class has polarized into a gold-plated gated community.

 

Even if we take class divisions for granted (as mainstream economists do), then the real picture of material inequality in the United States is staggering. And it has grown much worse in recent decades. Watch the short video below to get a clear picture of just how much wealth the upper 1 percent owns in the United States. By the way, even that 1 percent might be broken out into subcategories, since the upper tenth fraction of that upper 1 percent also has a steeper increase in total wealth.

 

Full story...

 

Related:

 

Viral Video Shows the Extent of U.S. Wealth Inequality, Charlie White, Mashable

  • The issue of wealth inequality across the United States is well known, but this video shows you the extent of that imbalance in dramatic and graphic fashion.
  • Billions for Banks, Nada for the Poor: Not Exactly a Compromise

Series | Socialism: Theory & Practice, Part 1

  • Capitalism is a "dog-eat-dog" system based upon the exploitation of working people. Socialism is a cooperative alternative to capitalism. The corporate media distorts socialism just as it lies about almost everything else in order to keep working people confused and disoriented. Solving our problems requires understanding socialism. Socialists understand the key to creating a better world is through: Education, Organization, Unity, & Action
  • Part 1: Albert Einstein, Why Socialism?
  • Albert Einstein, Socialism Theory and Practice

 

 

Pages

Subscribe to Books & Liturature