You are here

Books & Liturature

Riber Hansson | Obama with drones / media.cagle.com

 

Section(s): 

The definitive response to jerks asking, "But what about White History Month?"

Rebecca Eisenberg, Upworthy

Submitted by Evergreene Digest Contributing Editor Chante Wolf

 

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to all-reader supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button in the above right-hand corner—so we can bring you more just like it.

 

Next time your racist family member (everyone's got one of 'em, right?) tries to get clever and asks "But what about WHITE History Month?" on Facebook, just drop this gem of a video into the comments section. It'll shut them right up. 


 

Don't miss it around 4:44 when he explains why reverse racism isn't a thing and how he tries to keep his own privilege in check.

 

Full story (video)...

 

 

Related:

 

The Deep Wound of Wounded Knee, Johnny Barber, CounterPunch

  • Submitted by Evergreene Digest Contributing Editor Brian Willson
  • From the Lakota to Gaza
  • Israeli Terror: The “Final Solution” to the Palestine Question
  • Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee: An Indian History of the American West
  • Watch Nights mark Emancipation Proclamation's 150th Anniversary

 

Ralph Nader | $9 an Hour? How About a Living Wage!

  • Back in 2008, Obama campaigned to have a $9.50 per hour minimum wage by 2011. Now he's settling for $9.00 by 2015! ... How can leaders of poverty groups and unions accept this back-of-the-hand response to the plight of thirty million workers who make less today than what workers made 45 years ago in 1968, inflation adjusted?
  • Show Up To Catch Up With 1968
  • Exposed: How Whole Foods and the Biggest Organic Foods Distributor Are Screwing Workers

Ralph Nader, The Nader Page

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to all reader-supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button above—so we can bring you more just like it.

 

Is $9.00 an hour a livable wage? (photo: unknown)

 

Feb 16, 2013 | How could Barack Obama say, in his State of the Union speech, “let’s declare that in the wealthiest nation on earth no one who works full-time should have to live in poverty, and raise the federal minimum wage to $9.00 an hour”?

 

Back in 2008, Obama campaigned to have a $9.50 per hour minimum wage by 2011. Now he’s settling for $9.00 by 2015! Going backward into the future is the price that poverty groups and labor unions are paying by giving Mr. Obama a free ride last year on this moral imperative. How can leaders of poverty groups and unions accept this back-of-the-hand response to the plight of thirty million workers who make less today than what workers made 45 years ago in 1968, inflation adjusted?

 

Full story...

 

Related:

 

Exposed: How Whole Foods and the Biggest Organic Foods Distributor Are Screwing Workers, Ronnie Cummins, Dave Murphy, AlterNet

  • United Natural Foods Incorporated, the largest wholesale distributor of organic and “natural” foods in the U.S., is currently under investigation for 45 violations of federal labor law.
  • Whole Foods Accused of Accepting Genetically Modified Foods

 

 

I will not support Hillary Clinton for president

 

  • There are times when regular politics will not do, and this is one of those times. There are times a country is so tired of bull that only the truth can provide relief. 
  • The case against Hillary

Molly Ivins, Free Press

 

January 20, 2006 | I'd like to make it clear to the people who run the Democratic Party that I will not support Hillary Clinton for president. 

 

Enough. Enough triangulation, calculation and equivocation. Enough clever straddling, enough not offending anyone. This is not a Dick Morris election. Sen. Clinton is apparently incapable of taking a clear stand on the war in Iraq, and that alone is enough to disqualify her. Her failure to speak out on Terri Schiavo, not to mention that gross pandering on flag-burning, are just contemptible little dodges. 

 

The recent death of Gene McCarthy reminded me of a lesson I spent a long, long time unlearning, so now I have to re-learn it. It's about political courage and heroes, and when a country is desperate for leadership. There are times when regular politics will not do, and this is one of those times. There are times a country is so tired of bull that only the truth can provide relief. 

 

Full story...

 

Related:

 

The case against Hillary, Joan Walsh, Salon

  • An admirer explains: A campaign based on her inevitability and entitlement would crash and burn like it did in 2008.
  • Hillary’s Environmental Failure

 

 

David Sirota | The Blind Theology of Militarism

  • Drone-war cheerleaders ... are trying to change the linguistic foundation of the discourse from one rooted in fact to one rooted in a sophistry that narrows the public's perception of available choices.
  • In a country whose culture so often (wrongly) portrays bloodshed as the most effective problem solver, many Americans hear this now-ubiquitous drone-war argument and reflexively agree with its suppositions. 
  • Clean Cut Kid

David Sirota, Tahoe (NV) Daily Tribune <http://www.tahoedailytribune.com>

 

File photo, soldier's helmets. (photo: US Army) 

 

In my years reporting on the intentional narrowing of political vernacular to guarantee specific outcomes, I have encountered no better example of Orwellian newspeak than that which now dominates the conversation about America's drone war. Given that, it's worth reviewing the situation because it is so illustrative of how militarist propaganda operates in the 21st century.

 

As you know if you've paid attention to recent news, drone war proponents are currently facing inconvenient truths. This month, for instance, they are facing a new United Nations report showing that President Obama's escalation of the Afghanistan War — which is defined, in part, by an escalation in drone airstrikes — is killing hundreds of children “due notably to reported lack of precautionary measures and indiscriminate use of force.” They are also facing news that the rise in drone strikes is accompanying a rise in al-Qaida recruits, proving that, in predictable “blowback” fashion, the attacks may be creating more terrorists than they are neutralizing. 

 

Full story...

 

Related:

 

Clean Cut Kid, Gary G. Kohls, Duty to Warn / Evergreene Digest 

(and They Made a Killer Out of Him is What They Did)

 

 

How the Gun-Control Movement Got Smart

  • The gun debate has changed in remarkable ways in the last 15 years. But whether that change makes it more likely something gets done on the issue remains to be seen.
  • Why are advocates so optimistic now when reform has failed so many times before? Because they have a totally new strategy.

Molly Ball, Atlantic

 

This article is made possible with the generous contributions of all reader supported Evergreene Digest readers like you. Thank you!

 

Pete Souza/White House

 

Feb 7 2013 | Here is how advocates of gun control used to talk about their cause: They openly disputed that the Second Amendment conferred the right to own a gun. Their major policy goals were to make handguns illegal and enroll all U.S. gun owners in a federal database. The group now known as the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence was once known as Handgun Control Inc.; a 2001 book by the executive director of the Violence Policy Center was entitled Every Handgun Is Aimed at You: The Case for Banning Handguns.

 

Contrast that with what you see today: Gun-control groups don't even use the term "gun control," with its big-government implications, favoring "preventing gun violence" instead. Democratic politicians preface every appeal for reform with a paean to the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment and bend over backwards to assure "law-abiding gun owners" they mean them no ill will. Even the president, a Chicago liberal who once derided rural voters' tendency to "cling to guns or religion," seeks to assure gun enthusiasts he's one of them by citing a heretofore-unknown enthusiasm for skeet shooting, adding, "I have a profound respect for the traditions of hunting that trace back in this country for generations. And I think those who dismiss that out of hand make a big mistake."

 

Full story...

Dumb and Dumber

  • A Secret CIA Drone Base, a Blowback World, and Why Washington Has No Learning Curve
  • A Conspiracy of Stupidity
  • An Empire If You Can Keep It: Power and Principle in American Foreign Policy

Tom Engelhardt, Tom Dispatch

 

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to all-reader supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button in the above right-hand corner—so we can bring you more just like it.

 

February 12, 2013 | You could, of course, sit there, slack-jawed, thinking about how mindlessly repetitive American foreign and military policy is these days. Or you could wield all sorts of fancy analytic words to explain it.  Or you could just settle for a few simple, all-American ones.  Like dumb. Stupid. Dimwitted. Thick-headed. Or you could speak about the second administration in a row that wanted to leave no child behind, but was itself incapable of learning, or reasonably assessing its situation in the world.

 

Or you could simply wonder what’s in Washington’s water supply. Last week, after all, there was a perfect drone storm of a story, only a year or so late -- and no, it wasn’t that leaked “white paper” justifying the White House-directed assassination of an American citizen; and no, it wasn’t the two secret Justice Department “legal” memos on the same subject that members of the Senate Intelligence Committee were allowed to “view,” but in such secrecy that they couldn’t even ask John O. Brennan, the president’s counterterrorism tsar and choice for CIA director, questions about them at his public nomination hearings; and no, it wasn’t anything that Brennan, the man who oversaw the White House “kill list” and those presidentially chosen drone strikes, said at the hearings. And here’s the most striking thing: it should have set everyone’s teeth on edge, yet next to nobody even noticed.

 

Full story...

 

 

Related:

 

An Empire If You Can Keep It: Power and Principle in American Foreign Policy ~ Thomas M. Magstadt, Described in CQ Press

  • An Empire If You Can Keep It avoids polemics but does not shy away from the controversy raging in intellectual and policy circles over the Bush Doctrine.
  • Read a sample chapter
  • Five Signs 'Liberals' in Congress are Faking It

 

 

Nick Turse Describes the Real Vietnam War

  • “American culture has never fully come to grips with Vietnam,” Turse tells Bill, referring to “hidden and forbidden histories that just haven’t been fully engaged.”
  • Excerpt: Kill Anything That Moves ~ Nick Turse
  • Have we really learned the lessons of Vietnam?

Bill Moyers, Moyers & company

 

Thanks to Evergreene Digest reader Mary McNellis for this contribution

 

February 8, 2013 | Journalist Nick Turse describes his personal mission to compile a complete and compelling account of the Vietnam War’s horror as experienced by all sides, including innocent civilians who were sucked into its violent vortex.

 

Turse, who devoted 12 years to tracking down the true story of Vietnam, unlocked secret troves of documents, interviewed officials and veterans — including many accused of war atrocities — and traveled throughout the Vietnamese countryside talking with eyewitnesses to create his book, Kill Anything That Moves: The Real American War in Vietnam.

 

Full story...

 

Related:

 

Excerpt: Kill Anything That Moves ~ Nick TurseBill Moyers, Moyers & company

 

February 8, 2013 | Read the introduction from Nick Turse’s book, Kill Anything That Moves: The Real American War in Vietnam.

 

On January 21, 1971, a Vietnam veteran named Charles McDuff wrote a letter to President Richard Nixon to voice his disgust with the American war in Southeast Asia. McDuff had witnessed multiple cases of Vietnamese civilians being abused and killed by American soldiers and their allies, and he had found the U.S. military justice system to be woefully ineffective in punishing wrongdoers. “Maybe your advisors have not clued you in,” he told the president, “but the atrocities that were committed in Mylai are eclipsed by similar American actions throughout the country.” His three-page handwritten missive concluded with an impassioned plea to Nixon to end American participation in the war.

 

Have we really learned the lessons of Vietnam?, Nick Turse, Tom Dispatch / Salon

  • The media rarely discusses it, but civilian suffering has defined the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan
  • Those Who Say "I Support the Troops" Should Just Stop, Out of Respect for the Troops
  • Who's Sharing the Sacrifice?

 

 

Pages

Subscribe to Books &amp; Liturature