You are here

Economics

A Tale of Two Financial Collapses

Pro Labor Alliance

 

 

 

Section(s): 

Austerity is a Scam

  • Crisis Legislation and Dodgy Debt Repayment Schemes
  • Promissory Notes to Government Bonds
  • Paul Krugman | Global Austerity 'An Unethical Experimentation On Human Beings'

Caoimhghin Ó Croidheáin, Global Research

 

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to all reader-supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button above—so we can bring you more just like it.

 

February 08, 2013 | Austerity is a sham. Debt is economics for the ‘little people’.  If the people produce the wealth then why are they always poor and/or paying back debts? Because the national and international wealthy lend us back the money (with interest) they have taken out of society in the form of profits to fill in the gap they created in the first place. Thus we are triply exploited: We are taxed on wages, alienated from wealth created (profits) and we pay interest on the money borrowed from the wealthy to pay for the capital and current expenditure needed for the maintenance of society.

 

When there is an economic crisis caused by this constant draining of the wealth from the economy, the ‘experts’ then debate the best way to impose cutbacks to get us back on to ‘the road to recovery’. This would be funny if so many people were not caught up in the sea of unemployment and subsistence living.  Furthermore, any rejection of these ‘debts’ will not be countenanced by the elites who oversee the ‘debt repayments’ by the ‘little people’.

 

Full story...

 

Related:

 

 

 

Forbes’s myth of the Reagan boom

  • A columnist’s misleading economic history
  • The Betrayal of America's Middle Class Was a Choice, Not an Accident
  • Paul Krugman | Global Austerity 'An Unethical Experimentation On Human Beings'

Ryan Chittum, Columbia Journalism Review

 

This article is made possible with the generous contributions of all reader supported Evergreene Digest readers like you. Thank you!

 

October 3, 2012 | Peter Ferrara, currently of the climate-change denying Heartland Institute and formerly of Jack Abramoff’s payroll and the Reagan and Bush I administrations, writes for Forbes that Mitt Romney will cut middle class taxes, no matter what Barack Obama’s attack ads say.

 

Maybe so, but since Romney’s plan is mathematically impossible, the candidate doesn’t get the benefit of the doubt.

 

Romney’s bad math and conflicting promises are what allowed Obama to create ads that misleadingly assert that Romney would raise taxes on middle class families by up to $2,000. Romney has pledged to cut tax rates by 20 percent across the board while not losing any tax revenue. The Brookings Institution’s Tax Policy Center analyzed Romney’s proposal and said to get revenue neutrality, he’d have to raise taxes on middle class up to $2,000.

 

Full story...

 

Related:

 

The Betrayal of America's Middle Class Was a Choice, Not an Accident, Amy B Dean, Truthout 

  • The outsourcing of good jobs, the elimination of pensions, rampant home foreclosures; skyrocketing higher education costs and mounting debt: Given these stark realities, the American middle class seems to be sinking fast. The renowned reporting team of Donald Barlett and James Steele insists it is no accident.
  • Corporatism is Killing America

Paul Krugman | Global Austerity 'An Unethical Experimentation On Human Beings' Bonnie Kavoussi, Huffington Post

 

 

 

Paul Krugman | Global Austerity 'An Unethical Experimentation On Human Beings'

Bonnie KavoussiHuffington Post

 

This article is made possible with the generous contributions of all reader supported Evergreene Digest readers like you. Thank you!

 

Feb 8, 2013 | Paul Krugman doesn't just think austerity is bad economic policy; the Nobel Prize-winning economist says it's just plain wrong.

 

"We've basically had an unethical experimentation on human beings going on across the world right now," Krugman told HuffPost Live on Friday. "All these countries are pursuing austerity policies, and in doing so, they are giving us evidence on what actually happens when you do those policies."

 

Full story (with video)...

 

Related:

 

Paul Krugman: Austerity Is So Wrong! Paul Krugman, Daily Beast 

  • In a new book, End This Depression Now!, Nobel Prize–winning economist Paul Krugman says the current economic problems can be fixed both more easily and more quickly than anyone imagines. But politicians’ desire to slash spending is deeply destructive, and he details why austerity is so appealing even to Very Serious People—and why it’s such a bad idea.
  • Scott Walker's Austerity Agenda Yields 'Worst Job Losses in US'
  • Our Best Minds Are Failing Us

 

 

Poverty and Progress: Comparing the US and Venezuela

Republicans and Democrats, President Obama and House Speaker Boehner alike are culpable for the massive suffering and despair of the poor in the US who can look to Venezuela and the Bolivarian Revolution as a model for a truly progressive vision of the future.

 

 

Stop Imperialism

 

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to all-reader supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button in the above right-hand corner—so we can bring you more just like it.

 

Jan 29, 2013 | What does it mean to be “Third World” in 2013?  If we are to take the traditional definition of the term, then “Third World” refers to those (non-white) countries that struggle to attain high levels of economic development and which, for the most part, are reduced to the periphery of the global economy.  However, since the onset of the economic crisis beginning in 2007-2008, many of the economic problems of those traditionally poor countries have become ever more apparent in the so-called developed world.  Socio-economic maladies such as extreme poverty, hunger, and unemployment have skyrocketed in advanced capitalist countries like the United States, while politicians and the media continue to trumpet the mirage of an economic recovery.  Naturally, one must ask for whom this is a recovery…for the poor or for Wall St?  Moreover, it has forced the world to examine what progress looks like.  One way of doing so is to analyze what the statistics tell us about the United States versus Venezuela.  In so doing, one begins to get a much clearer picture, free from the distortions of media and politicians alike, of just how much progress has been made in the Bolivarian Revolution while the situation of the poor and working classes in the US continues to deteriorate.

 

Full story...

Is Shrinking US GDP Beginning of Double-Dip Recession Caused by Government Austerity?

  • Below are three commentaries on what the shrinking GDP in the last quarter means.  Time will tell as to whether this is the beginning of a double-dip recession.
  • Paul Krugman: Austerity Is So Wrong!

Jack Rasmus, Jon Queally, Martin Hutchinson, It's Our Economy

 

Submitted by Evergreene Digest Contributing Editor Kevin Zeese

 

This article is made possible with the generous contributions of all reader supported Evergreene Digest readers like you. Thank you!

 

On January 30, 2013 for the fourth quarter 2012 showed a decline in GDP of -0.1% for the last three months of 2012, thus raising the specter of the US economy, facing still further deficit spending cuts in 2013 amidst declining consumer confidence, may be on track for a possible double dip recession in 2013 or 2014 along with other economies in Europe, the UK, and Japan.

 

In the fourth quarter GDP numbers, government and business inventory spending led the decline.  To the extent consumer spending played a positive role at all in the 4th quarter, it was largely driven by auto sales—stimulated by auto dealers offering buyers deep price discounts, virtually free credit with near 0% auto loan interest rates, as well new auto purchases in the northeast as a result of Hurricane Sandy’s destruction of existing auto stock.  2012 Holiday season retail sales data, in contrast, were otherwise not particularly notable and would have been much worse without the auto sales exception.  How much longer auto companies can continue the deep price discounts and free credit remains a question going forward.  Net export sales continued to sag in the last quarter, as the slowdown in world manufacturing and trade continued.   And, as others have noted, an important source of past consumer spending and GDP growth—i.e. health care services—began to slow ominously at the end of 2012 as well, promising to continue that trend into 2013.

 

Full story...

 

Paul Krugman: Austerity Is So Wrong! Paul Krugman, Daily Beast 

  • In a new book, End This Depression Now!, Nobel Prize–winning economist Paul Krugman says the current economic problems can be fixed both more easily and more quickly than anyone imagines. But politicians’ desire to slash spending is deeply destructive, and he details why austerity is so appealing even to Very Serious People—and why it’s such a bad idea.
  • Scott Walker's Austerity Agenda Yields 'Worst Job Losses in US'
  • Our Best Minds Are Failing Us

 

 

The Myth of Living Beyond Our Means

  • The richest 1 percent now own more than 35 percent of all of the nation’s household wealth, and 38 percent of the nation’s financial assets – including stocks and pension funds. The richest 400 Americans have more wealth than the bottom 150 million of us put together. 6 Walmart heirs have more wealth than bottom 33 million American families combined. So why are we even contemplating cutting programs the middle class and poor depend on, and raising raising their taxes?
  • The GOP’s 1 Trillion Dollar Lie
  • Is Our Future Going to Be Keeping Rich People Happy in a Servant Economy? 

Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

 

Submitted by Evergreene Digest Contributing Editor Lydia Howell

 

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to all reader-supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button above—so we can bring you more just like it.

 

January 24, 2013 | Brace yourself. In coming weeks you’ll hear there’s no serious alternative to cutting Social Security and Medicare, raising taxes on middle class, and decimating what’s left of the federal government’s discretionary spending on everything from education and job training to highways and basic research.

“We” must make these sacrifices, it will be said, in order to deal with our mushrooming budget deficit and cumulative debt. 

 

But most of the people who are making this argument are very wealthy or are sponsored by the very wealthy: Wall Street moguls like Pete Peterson and his “Fix the Debt” brigade, the Business Roundtable, well-appointed think tanks and policy centers along the Potomac, members of the Simpson-Bowles commission. 

 

Full story...

 

Related:

 

The GOP’s 1 Trillion Dollar Lie, Joshua Holland, AlterNet / In These Times

  • Given that the United States has one of the weakest social safety nets in the world, it's obvious we're not spending more on each family in poverty than the median income, defense, Social Security and Medicare.
  • How a right-wing whopper about the cost of welfare was born.

Is Our Future Going to Be Keeping Rich People Happy in a Servant Economy? Sam Pizzigati, AlterNet

  • That's where we seem to be headed, as we shed decent American jobs. 
  • The Servant Economy:  Where America’s Elite is  Sending the Middle Class
  • The "BS" Austerity Plan Nobody Wants ... and We May Get Anyway

 

 

Extreme Wealth vs Global Sharing

  • Campaigners have long proposed measures to reduce extreme inequality, but policymakers remain fixated on an economic model that threatens to undermine the fabric of society. When will the political elite heed the growing demands for redistribution that are being voiced in countless reports, books and public protests? 
  • It's Our Economy
  • Five Facts About America's Pathological Wealth Distribution

Rajesh Makwana, Counter Currents

 

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to all reader-supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button above—so we can bring you more just like it.

 

January 23, 2013 | Last year alone, the world's 100 richest people earned a combined additional income of $241 billion. According to new calculations, redistributing just a quarter of this vast quantity of money would enable governments to wipe out extreme poverty for an entire year. Unfortunately for the  40,000 people who die needlessly every day  <http://www.stwr.org/economic-sharing-alternatives/financing-the-global-s... from poverty-related causes, these billionaires are as unlikely to share their earnings voluntarily as governments are to enact policies that redistribute their excessive incomes more fairly across society.

 

In the latest in a string of reports, books and public protests by those calling for sharing and justice to guide social and economic policy, Oxfam has put forward a robust argument for putting an end to extreme wealth by 2025. In their media briefing, ‘ The cost of inequality: how wealth and income extremes hurt us all ', the charity gives a litany of reasons why extreme inequality is bad for the economy, the environment and society in general.

 

Full story...

 

Related:

 

It's Our Economy, Kevin Zeese, It's Our Economy

The economy becomes OUR economy when people have a say over economic issues and when the economy works for all of us rather than funneling wealth to the top 1%.

 

Five Facts About America's Pathological Wealth Distribution, Paul Buchheit, Common Dreams

  • Americans are beginning to realize that years of preferential tax treatment for the rich, under the guise of "supply-side job creation" nonsense, have bloated the fortunes of the super-rich to a level that would make Rockefeller and Carnegie envious.
  • Iceland Did It Right...and Everyone Else Is Doing It Wrong

 

 

Pages

Subscribe to Economics