You are here

Human Rights & Civil Liberties

Romney's 47%: What Other Rights Would The GOP Deny Them?

 

  • Demonizing Obama's supporters as government dependents makes it easier to pass repressive voting laws.
  • Mitt Romney on "Freeloaders," Mideast, and Why He's Scared of the Women on 'the View"
  • Democrats Retreat on Civil Liberties in 2012 Platform

Brendan Fischer, AlterNet

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to
all-reader supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button in the above right-hand corner—so we can bring you more just like it.

September 18, 2012  |  Leaked video of GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney telling donors that 47 percent of Americans vote because they are "dependent on government" and "believe that they are victims" might help explain why restrictive voter ID laws have attracted Republican support -- because "these people" can't be trusted with the vote.

Mother Jones published video of Romney speaking freely with a closed-door gathering of donors earlier this year, where among other things he said:

"There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what . . . I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives."

Full story...

Related:

Mitt Romney on "Freeloaders," Mideast, and Why He's Scared of the Women on 'the View" AlterNet

  • Candidate expresses belief that there's not much he can do about peace in the Middle East, so as POTUS he'll hope to pass it on to the next guy.
  • Full Secret Video Released
  • 8 Falsehoods, Lies and Misstatements From Romney Fundraising Video
  • Romney Says Typical Middle-Class Homes Earn $250,000 A Year

Democrats Retreat on Civil Liberties in 2012 Platform, Adam Serwer, Mother Jones

  • The distance between the 2008 and 2012 platform shows just how hard it has been, and starkly illustrates the extent to which the Democratic Party has given up on its 2008 promises to roll back the national security state that emerged and expanded in the wake of the 9/11 attacks.
  • Obama: A disaster for civil liberties
  • Noam Chomsky | The Shredding of Our Constitutional Rights
     

Interfaith Event on Voting Rights

  • Please join Congressman Ellison and Ms. Arnwine for a discussion on voting rights ranging from the Jim Crowe Era up to the debates of the present.
  • The One-Two Punch
  • Catholics, Lutherans and voter ID

Rebecca Lucero

Submitted by Evergreene Digest Contributing Editor Betty Culver

This article is made possible with the generous contributions of all reader supported Evergreene Digest readers like you. Thank you!

This event will feature Congressman Keith Ellison and guest speaker: Barbara Arnwine. We are very excited to have Ms. Arnwine join us for this event.  Barbara Arnwine is the President and Executive Director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. She is an internationally renowned expert on civil justice issues and a prominent leader of Election Protection, the nation’s largest nonpartisan voter protection coalition.

Monday, Sept 24, 3pm
New Salem Missionary Baptist Church
2507 Bryant Ave N, Minneapolis MN 55411
Please RSVP at 612-522-1212.

Please join Congressman Ellison and Ms. Arnwine for a discussion on voting rights ranging from the Jim Crowe Era up to the debates of the present.

Feel free to circulate to all those in the faith community you feel would like to attend. If you have any questions, feel free to e-mail or call me. Please RSVP at 612-522-1212.

This event is free and open to members of the faith community.

Related:

The One-Two Punch, Ricardo Levins Morales, rlmarts.com

  • The blueprint for eliminating fifty years of LGBT advances in all areas of life and law is to be found in their voter suppression strategy, not the Marriage Amendment.
  • The Marriage Amendment As Decoy and How to Fight The Real Danger

Catholics, Lutherans and voter ID, Lori Sturdevant, Minneapolis (MN) Star Tribune
(September 8, 2012) Let's hear what two of Minnesota's prominent faith-based social service agencies have to say.

 

Democrats Retreat on Civil Liberties in 2012 Platform


 

  • The distance between the 2008 and 2012 platform shows just how hard it has been, and starkly illustrates the extent to which the Democratic Party has given up on its 2008 promises to roll back the national security state that emerged and expanded in the wake of the 9/11 attacks.
  • Obama: A disaster for civil liberties
  • Noam Chomsky | The Shredding of Our Constitutional Rights

Adam Serwer, Mother Jones

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to
all reader-supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button above—so we can bring you more just like it.

(September 4, 2012) What a difference four years makes.

In 2008, Democrats were eager to draw a contrast <http://www.democrats.org/democratic-national-platform>with what they then portrayed as Republican excesses in the fight against Al Qaeda. Since then, the Obama administration has in many cases continued the national security policies of its predecessor—and the

Democratic Party's 2012 platform highlights this reversal, abandoning much of the substance and all of the bombast of the 2008 platform. Here are a few places where the differences are most glaring.

Full story...

Related:

Obama: A disaster for civil liberties, Jonathan Turley, Los Angeles (CA) Times

  • President Obama failed to close Guantanamo Bay, continued warrantless surveillance and military tribunals and asserted the right to kill U.S. citizens he views as terrorists.
  • He may prove the most disastrous president in our history in terms of civil liberties.
  • Obama Makes Assasination of American Citizens a Reality

Noam Chomsky | The Shredding of Our Constitutional Rights, Part 2, Noam Chomsky,  Guardian UK

  • How the Magna Carta became a Minor Carta
  • The Obama administration has perpetuated an assault on the foundations of traditional liberties
  • 
Noam Chomsky | The Shredding of Our Constitutional Rights, Part 1



 

Noam Chomsky | The Shredding of Our Constitutional Rights, Part 2

  • How the Magna Carta became a Minor Carta
  • The Obama administration has perpetuated an assault on the foundations of traditional liberties
  • 
Noam Chomsky | The Shredding of Our Constitutional Rights, Part 1


Noam Chomsky,  Guardian UK

If you are on a tight budget, don't contribute cash! Instead, contribute just by forwarding articles to your friends - and non-Progressives too ;). - And because we need help building our all reader supported Evergreene Digest community, you can invite your Facebook friends to join us. That's a big help too.
    
Four of the earliest surviving copies of the Magna Carta, the 1297 charter issued by King Edward I, on display at the Bodleian library, Oxford. Photograph: Martin Argles for the Guardian

(July 25, 2012) The post-civil war 14th amendment granted the rights of persons to former slaves, though mostly in theory. At the same time, it created a new category of persons with rights: corporations. In fact, almost all the cases brought to the courts under the 14th amendment had to do with corporate rights, and by a century ago, they had determined that these collectivist legal fictions, established and sustained by state power, had the full rights of persons of flesh and blood; in fact, far greater rights, thanks to their scale, immortality, and protections of limited liability. Their rights by now far transcend those of mere humans. Under the "free trade agreements", the Pacific Rim can, for example, sue El Salvador for seeking to protect the environment; individuals cannot do the same. General Motors can claim national rights in Mexico. There is no need to dwell on what would happen if a Mexican demanded national rights in the United States.

Domestically, recent supreme court rulings greatly enhance the already enormous political power of corporations and the super-rich, striking further blows against the tottering relics of functioning political democracy.

Full story...

Related:

Noam Chomsky | The Shredding of Our Constitutional Rights, Part 1, Noam Chomsky, Evergreene Digest
The Magna Carta was a milestone in civil and human rights. Can we stop its principles being shredded before our eyes?
 

Police in legal minefield on Arizona immigration law

  • Since it overwhelmingly passed Arizona's Republican-controlled Legislature in 2010, the immigration law has been fiercely challenged in court.
  • Immigrants prove big business for prison companies

Jacques Billeaud and Nicholas Riccardi, Associated Press / Huffington Post

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to
all-reader supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button in the above right-hand corner—so we can bring you more just like it.

Joe Arpaio, known for his hardline approach to immigration enforcement, is the sheriff of Maricopa County, which includes Phoenix. (AP)

(September 6, 2012) More than two years after it was signed into law, the most contentious part of Arizona's landmark immigration legislation is expected to finally go into effect following a federal court ruling issue late Wednesday.

But the U.S. Supreme Court has laid a legal minefield that Arizona now must navigate when the critical provision takes effect. The clause, one of the few significant ones that the high court left standing in a June ruling, requires all Arizona police officers to check the immigration status of people they stop while enforcing other laws and suspect are in the country illegally.

Full story...

Related:

Immigrants prove big business for prison companies, Garance Burke, Associated Press / Salon

  • The U.S. is locking up more illegal immigrants than ever before, generating a lucrative business for the nation's largest prison companies.
  • By the Numbers: The U.S.'s Growing For-Profit Detention Industry
     

Voter ID Amendment Would Restrict Voting – for Seniors, the Military, our Neighbors

  • Taking away the vote from our neighbors under the pretext of preventing "fraud" is a radical step backwards for that democracy. The constitution is supposed to guarantee human rights, not take them away from others who Republican politicians apparently don't want to vote.
  • Going Undercover at the GOP's Voter Vigilante Project to Disrupt the Nov. Election
  • Voter Suppression: The "Schurick Doctrine" and the Unravelling of American Democracy

MN Senator John Marty, Apple Pie Alliance

This article is made possible with the generous contributions of Evergreene Digest readers like you. Thank you!

Bill Schorr

(August 31, 2012 ) Supporters of Minnesota's proposed Constitutional Amendment to restrict voting ask people to ratify it based on an appeal to their narrow self interest. Despite the lack of fraud from voter impersonation, they imply that a voter is "protecting" his or her own vote. But blocking tens of thousands of other Minnesotans from voting because one or two of them might have been fraudulent, is in not protecting one's own vote.

Amendment proponents appeal to fear and self-interest, but I want to appeal to Minnesotans' sense of fairness. It is wrong to place roadblocks that make it impossible to vote for the senior in assisted living, the soldier serving in Afghanistan, the disabled woman who is homebound, or the veteran who is homeless. They have a right to vote too.

Full story...

Related:

Going Undercover at the GOP's Voter Vigilante Project to Disrupt the Nov. Election, Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet

  • The Republican True the Vote project is a well-funded scheme with training sessions for activists across the country. Will it work?
  • Includes news about Minnesota Majority (organization pushing voter ID referendum) and the Wisconsin recall election shenanigans.

Voter Suppression: The "Schurick Doctrine" and the Unravelling of American Democracy, Ruth Rosen, openDemocracy

  • Republicans across the United States have passed a spate of voter suppression laws aimed at those most likely to vote for Obama. They are specifically targeting African American women who, in the past, created a gender gap that decisively
  • elected Democratic presidents. America needs immediate international monitoring of its presidential election.
  • Although the Republican effort is not exactly a secret, few Americans are discussing it with the urgency it deserves.
  • Going Undercover at the GOP's Voter Vigilante Project to Disrupt the Nov. Election
  • The One-Two Punch
     

Voter Suppression: The "Schurick Doctrine" and the Unravelling of American Democracy

  • Republicans across the United States have passed a spate of voter suppression laws aimed at those most likely to vote for Obama. They are specifically targeting African American women who, in the past, created a gender gap that decisively elected Democratic presidents. America needs immediate international monitoring of its presidential election.
  • Although the Republican effort is not exactly a secret, few Americans are discussing it with the urgency it deserves.
  • Going Undercover at the GOP's Voter Vigilante Project to Disrupt the Nov. Election
  • The One-Two Punch

Ruth Rosen, openDemocracy

Submitted by Evergreene Digest Contributing Editor Lydia Howell

This article is made possible with the generous contributions of Evergreene Digest readers like you. Thank you!

(August 27. 2012) How will the American Presidential election be won in November 2012? By the Republicans buying the election? Perhaps. But money cannot always buy an election. That is why Republicans have spent the last 4-6 years passing a spate of voter suppression laws in “swing states” that will make it more difficult and costly for the young, the elderly, minorities, union members and single and elderly women to cast a vote for Barack Obama.

Although the Republican effort is not exactly a secret, few Americans are discussing it with the urgency it deserves. The nonpartisan Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law says that since the start of 2011, 16 states—which account for 214 electoral votes—have passed restrictive voting laws. Each law is different: some curb voter registration drives; others require new and costly forms of identification; and still others insist that voters produce government-issued photo IDs at the polls. The Brennan Center also points out that:

“[T]he scope of the suppression movement and its potential impact are staggering ... as many as 11 percent of eligible voters—roughly 21 million Americans—lack current, unexpired government-issued photo IDs. The percentages are even higher among seniors, African-Americans and other minorities, the working poor, the disabled and students—constituencies that traditionally skew Democratic and whose disenfranchisement could prove decisive in any close election.”

Full story...

Related:

Going Undercover at the GOP's Voter Vigilante Project to Disrupt the Nov. Election, Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet

  • The Republican True the Vote project is a well-funded scheme with training sessions for activists across the country. Will it work?
  • Includes news about Minnesota Majority (organization pushing voter ID referendum) and the Wisconsin recall election shenanigans.

The One-Two Punch, Ricardo Levins Morales, rlmarts.com
The blueprint for eliminating fifty years of LGBT advances in all areas of life and law is to be found in their voter suppression strategy, not the Marriage Amendment.
The Marriage Amendment As Decoy and How to Fight The Real Danger

 

Going Undercover at the GOP's Voter Vigilante Project to Disrupt the Nov. Election

  • The Republican True the Vote project is a well-funded scheme with training sessions for activists across the country. Will it work?
  • Includes news about Minnesota Majority (organization pushing voter ID referendum) and the Wisconsin recall election shenanigans.

Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet

Submitted by Evergreene Digest Contributing Editor Lydia Howell

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to all-reader supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button in the above right-hand corner—so we can bring you more just like it.
 
(August 24, 2012) I was nervous getting onto the flight to Denver. Since 2004, I have been a national radio producer, investigative reporter, author and consultant—writing about how elections are won, lost, bungled and improved, with a big focus on voter registration. But I had never snuck into a meeting of right-wing voting vigilantes who are the frontline of a national voter suppression strategy, and where the main speaker was a man whose new book I’d aggressively debunked days before, in an AlterNet article lauded by a leading election law blog and Washington Post . The meeting was a state summit organized by a group called True The Vote . The author was John Fund, who absurdly claims that more than 1,000 felons voted illegally in Minnesota in 2008, sending Democrat Al Franken to the U.S. Senate, where he was the final vote that passed Obama's health care reform.

I didn’t want to be outed or bullied. I support citizen activism and was intrigued, even if I knew I was heading into the heart of the GOP election fraud brigade at the Colorado summit. On the plane, I wondered why many of the right-wing activists I hoped to meet in Denver believe as they do—eyeing almost all phases of the voting process with suspicion and mistaking errors as political conspiracies. The group’s Web site was very thin, but as knowledgeable people told me, they had big money behind them and were organizing on a scale that recalled the early days of the Christian Coalition. 

Full story...

Pages

Subscribe to Human Rights &amp; Civil Liberties