You are here

Law & Justice

With Executive Order on Policing, Trump Declares Racialized War on Dissent

http://www.truth-out.org/images/Images_2017_02/2017_0210police.jpg

A protester faces a line of police officers in the days after the fatal police shooting of Alton Sterling in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on July 10, 2016. (Photo: Edmund D. Fountain / New York Times)

  • The order can be read as an official authorization, from one white supremacist -- Steve Bannon -- to another -- Jeff Sessions -- to pursue the most racist and reactionary criminal legal policies in recent memory.
  • Related: Can Customs and Border Officials Search Your Phone? These Are Your Rights

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Have%20You%20No%20Shame%20with%2011%20Yr%20Banner%20alt_0.jpgCalling Out The Readers Who Do Not Donate: 

Being totally honest we have a lot of people who visit Evergreene Digest all the time and do not donate. That misses the point. This is not an entertainment site. If you want to entertained head on over to the New York Times. That way you get progressive news plus hype, tabloid titillation and good old fashioned T&A. 

This is Evergreene Digest.  if you want to be a part of changing things, be a part of this. EGD is supported by hard working people of limited means. Don't let them carry the burden by themselves. Chip in, sign up and get on board. You are needed and welcome here. 

In solidarity, 

Dave & the Crew


http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Rights%20%26%20Liberties%20Banner.jpg

Friday, February 10, 2017 | On the heels of the much ballyhooed meeting that an obsequious Donald Trump conducted this week with local law enforcement officials from across the country, the president titillated the gendarmes with a threat to destroy -- COINTELPRO style -- an unnamed Texas state senator rumored to be introducing legislation to prevent law enforcement from financing police operations by seizing arrestees' property before they have been found guilty in a court of law. On Thursday, Trump followed up with an executive order that gave the recently confirmed Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions a carte blanche to bring down the wrath of the federal government on anyone who is unfortunate enough to have a confrontation with a cop, a prison guard, a border patrol officer or who knows who else outfitted with a badge and carrying a gun.

At first blush, the order could be seen simply as a wildly unpopular president playing macho man to our nation's police departments and their reactionary police unions. The unions have been chafing over being curbed by the previous administration's Department of Justice (DOJ), which, by means of pattern-or-practice investigations and consent decrees, started to put the brakes on racist police violence. On its face, Trump's new order looks like much bluster, with no enforcement mechanisms. Many of the provisions will need to be passed by Congress, receive funding and ultimately, pass constitutional muster -- a hurdle that the authoritarian Trump administration, with its white supremacist hatchet men at the helm, seems unwilling to pay even a trifling respect.

Flint Taylor has been litigating cases against police torture in Chicago for 30 years and is one of the lawyers for the families of slain Black Panther leaders Fred Hampton and Mark Clark. Together with his law partner Jeffrey Haas, Taylor was trial counsel in the marathon 1976 civil trial. For more information on the Hampton/Clark case, the history of the Black Panther Party and the FBI's program to destroy it, visit PeoplesLawOffice.com.

Full story … 

Related: 

http://www.truth-out.org/images/Images_2017_03/2017_0317phone.jpg (Photo: Deyvi Romero)  

Can Customs and Border Officials Search Your Phone? These Are Your Rights, Patrick G. Lee, ProPublica / Truth-out

  • Recent incidents have revived confusion and alarm over what powers border officials actually have and, perhaps more importantly, how to know when they are overstepping their authority.
  • Related: What you — yes, you! — can do to save America from tyranny.

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

If the Elusive Mr. Gorsuch is Confirmed, the Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court Won't Recover.

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/SCOTUS%20Courtroom.jpg

  • Part 1: If Gorsuch is confirmed, the legitimacy of the US supreme court won't recover.
  • Never before has Senate leadership so openly and intentionally played political games with our highest court. The consequences are staggering.
  • Part 2: The Elusive Mr. Gorsuch
  • A long day of questioning before the Senate Judiciary Committee yielded few substantive hints about how Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch will act on criminal justice or any other substantive topics.
  • Related: Plenty of evasion, little drama.

Compiled by David Culver, Ed., Evergreene Digest

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/I%20Want%20You%20with%2011%20Yr%20Banner.jpg Calling Out The Readers Who Do Not Donate: 

Being totally honest we have a lot of people who visit Evergreene Digest all the time and do not donate. That misses the point. This is not an entertainment site. If you want to entertained head on over to the New York Times. That way you get progressive news plus hype, tabloid titillation and good old fashioned T&A. 

This is Evergreene Digest.  if you want to be a part of changing things, be a part of this. EGD is supported by hard working people of limited means. Don't let them carry the burden by themselves. Chip in <>, sign up and get on board. You are needed and welcome here. 

In solidarity, 

Dave & the Crew



Part 1: If Gorsuch is confirmed, the legitimacy of the US supreme court won't recover.

Never before has Senate leadership so openly and intentionally played political games with our highest court. The consequences are staggering.

Russ Feingold, the Guardian UK

https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/4c6e652e398b242b73020acba75576294b1853cf/0_0_3440_2064/master/3440.jpg?w=620&q=55&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&s=b4d4f40b0cf1ac999169f86d131fe546 Republican senators abandoned their constitutional responsibilities and blocked Judge Garland’s nomination last year.’ Photograph: Carolyn Kaster/AP

Monday 20 March 2017 | While Russia’s involvement in our elections is unquestionably horrible, and it will likely take many more drip, drip, drips before we know the full extent of it, our democracy is facing an equally devastating threat much closer to home.

On Monday, when Judge Gorsuch’s confirmation hearing is scheduled to begin, the Republicans will attempt to complete their cynical political takeover of the US supreme court, launched last year when they failed to confirm or to even give a hearing to Judge Merrick Garland.

Russ Feingold was a 16 year member of the US Senate Judiciary Committee.

Full story … 



Part 2: The Elusive Mr. Gorsuch

A long day of questioning before the Senate Judiciary Committee yielded few substantive hints about how Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch will act on criminal justice or any other substantive topics.

The Marshall Project

March 22, 2017 | “No promises.” A long day of questioning before the Senate Judiciary Committee yielded few substantive hints about how Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch will act on criminal justice or any other substantive topics. New York Times He repeatedly refused, as have his predecessors, to discuss the merits of cases or causes that he said he may face as a justice. Roll Call  And he said he had made no deal with President Trump on abortion to get the nomination. Atlantic

Republicans praised him as a restrained, independent jurist. Democrats pressed him on his prior positions on employment law, religious liberty, and corporate rights. Washington Post

Related: Plenty of evasion, little drama. NPR

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

Special Project | Trump's Sanctuary Cities Plan is Straight Out of Breitbart, Radical Right Playbook

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/WH%2C%20Trump%2C%20Bannon%20Sanctuary%20Cities%20banner.jpg

Alex Amend, Southern Poverty Law Center

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/SPLC%20Hatewatch%20banner.jpg January 26, 2017 | The aim is to pressure the many major cities and states that have already announced their unwillingness to cooperate with the administration’s increasingly hardline policies against undocumented immigrants. Because these communities have generally declined to task local law enforcement with enforcing federal immigration laws, they have come to be known as sanctuary cities.

For anyone familiar with Breitbart News under Stephen K. Bannon, it’s obvious that this new fear-mongering tactic comes straight from the playbook of the man who is now the chief strategist and senior counselor to the president. Bannon’s Breitbart has championed such hardline anti-immigrant ideas for years.

Alex Amend: Digital Media Director, Southern Poverty Law Center

Full story … 

Related:

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Reader%20Supported%20News%20donate%20graphic.jpg If you like reading this article, consider joining the crew of all reader-supported Evergreene Digest by contributing the equivalent of a cafe latte a month--using the donation button in the above right-hand corner—so we can bring you more just like it.



The Positive Effects of Sanctuary Policies on Crime and the Economy, Tom K. Wong, Center for American Progress

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Immigration%20Banner.jpg

The Data Are Clear: Sanctuary Counties See Lower Crime Rates and Stronger Economies

 

A Crackdown On Our Right To Stand Up

https://socialistworker.org/sites/default/files/imagecache/425/images/7238289306_6b6c7f7075_o.jpg

Above Photo: From Socialist Worker 

  • Nicole Colson explains how Republican-led legislatures are trying to push through laws to criminalize dissent–in the hopes of stopping the growing fight against the right.
  • Related: 'People Have the Right to Take to the Streets'

Nicole Colson, Socialist Worker / Popular Resistance

https://secure.consumersunion.org/images/content/pagebuilder/Industry-telling.jpg February 14, 2017 | Less than  three weeks into his presidency, Donald Trump is clearly what George W. Bush once claimed to be: “a uniter, not a divider.” Only he’s been uniting many hundreds of thousands of people in protest and many millions in outrage at his bigoted, right-wing actions since taking office.

But Trump’s right-wing admirers around the country have seized on a strategy to push back against mass protest–by criminalizing it. Lawmakers in multiple states are proposing measures explicitly designed to curtail dissent.

Nicole Colson is a reporter for Socialist Worker and a contributor to the International Socialist Review and CounterPunch. She frequently writes on civil liberties, the environment, women’s rights and culture. 

Full story … 

 

Related:

'People Have the Right to Take to the Streets' Janine Jackson, Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR)

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Democracy%20Spring%20Cable%20News%20Blackout.jpg

Janine Jackson interviewed Mara Verheyden-Hilliard about the inauguration protests for the January 27, 2017, episode of CounterSpin. This is a lightly edited transcript.

  http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

Florida Supreme Court: More than 200 death row inmates were given unconstitutional death sentences

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/field/image/Rights%20%26%20Liberties%20Banner.jpg

  • The court found that death sentences decided by a judge, not a jury, were unconstitutional. More than 200 inmates are affected by the ruling, which only applies to sentences imposed since 2002. That means more than half of the people on death row will get re-sentenced. 
  • Related: Another Botched Execution

Rene Stutzman and Gal Tziperman Lotan, Orlando (FL) Sentinel

http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/131869.jpg Journalism with real independence and integrity is a rare thing. All reader supported Evergreene Digest relies - exclusively!- on reader donations. Click on the donation button above to make a contribution and support our work.

 

 


 

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/01/11/opinion/justice190v.jpgDecember 22, 2016 | he Florida Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the state's death penalty was so flawed for so long that more than half of the people on death row may be entitled to new sentencing hearings.

That opinion, handed down in a pair of decisions Thursday, covers more than 200 inmates awaiting execution — and includes all of those who were sentenced after 2002 or whose appeals were not final by that year.

It is a legal decision that death row inmates, defense attorneys, prosecutors and the families of murder victims have awaited since January, when the U.S. Supreme Court found the state's death penalty unconstitutional.

Rene Stutzman and Gal Tziperman Lotan, Staff Writers, Orlando (FL) Sentinel 

Full story … 

Related:

Another Botched Execution, Martha Rosenberg, opednews.com

  • As the nation is horrified by another botched execution, a capital defense lawyer in Texas, legal scholar in New York and the former warden of San Quentin work against capital punishment.
  • Rachel Maddow's Harrowing Description Of Botched Arizona Execution
  • Cops Behaving Badly, June 28,2014

What’s not being voted on this November: Local democracy is being squashed from coast to coast

 

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Politics%20Banner.jpg

Corporations, courts, and politicians evade democracy by squashing local measures on fracking, wages, GMOs and more.

Simon Davis-Cohen, Salon

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/PineTreeLogo%20%28Green%29.JPG This Content-Rich Site Is Worth Fighting For

  • We have proven that corporate cash/advertising and major investors are - not - necessary to fund a news reporting organization. The result is a news source that people actually trust.
  • It also means that we have to fight for funding. So we fight, with a clear conscience.
  • We need more of you to help. ASAP.

Dave & the Crew


 

http://media.salon.com/2016/10/election_issues-620x412.jpg File - This March 21, 2016 file photo shows the Flint Water Plant water tower in Flint, Mich. After months of national attention on lead-tainted drinking water in Flint, many are starting to ask questions about a 74-mile pipeline being built from Lake Huron to the struggling former auto manufacturing powerhouse. The $285 million project is rooted in political ambitions and long-simmering resentment toward Detroit, which for decades had near-total control of the city’s water rates. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio File)(Credit: AP/Paul Sancya/Carlos Osorio/Brennan Linsley)

Sunday, October 30, 2016 | People across the country have turned to the local ballot initiative process — by which citizens write, petition for and vote on legislation — to push the needle on key legislative battles around fracking, the minimum wage, police reform and many other issues. The response of state legislatures, wary of local activism, in passing state “preemption” laws to remove “local control” is well documented.

Less well known, however, is the role of courts and city governments in barring local citizens from even bringing these issues to a vote. In fact, the very power of local direct democracy to effect change on these contentious issues is in the crosshairs.

Despite petitioners collecting sufficient signatures, at least nine local ballot initiatives in Minnesota, Ohio and Washington state have been removed from November ballots. There are almost certainly other examples. Often the mere possibility or threat of state preemption is used as grounds to stop a duly qualified initiative from being voted on. Here are several of the more prominent examples.

Simon Davis-Cohen: freelance investigative journalist examining the powers of local governments and corporations in the United States.

Full story … 

FCC Passes Sweeping Internet Privacy Rules in ‘Big Win for Civil Rights’

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Media%20%26%20Technology%20Banner.jpg

  • “It’s the consumers’ information,” FCC chairman Tom Wheeler said. “How it is used should be the consumers’ choice. Not the choice of some corporate algorithm.”
  • "Just as telephone companies are not allowed to listen in to our calls or sell information about who we talk to, our internet providers shouldn't be allowed to monitor our internet usage for profit." —Jay Stanley, ACLU

Nadia Prupis, Common Dreams / Truthdig

 

http://www.commondreams.org/sites/default/files/styles/cd_large/public/headlines/internet_privacy.jpg?itok=HBCYfQl_ The rules require Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to get customers' explicit consent before using or sharing behavioral data like browsing history, location, and other sensitive information. (Photo: Blogtrepreneur/flickr/cc)  

Oct 27, 2016 | The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on Thursday passed sweeping new privacy rules designed to keep broadband providers from giving customers’ private data to third parties.

The rules, approved by a vote of 3-2, require Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to get customers’ explicit consent before using or sharing behavioral data like browsing history, location, and other sensitive information with marketing firms or other companies, the Washington Post reports.

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Shame%2C%20Donate.jpg

“It’s the consumers’ information,” FCC chairman Tom Wheeler said. “How it is used should be the consumers’ choice. Not the choice of some corporate algorithm.”

Nadia Prupis is a Common Dreams <http://www.commondreams.org> staff writer.

Full story … 

Section(s): 

Police Shootings Won't Stop Unless We Also Stop Shaking Down Black People

  http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Rights%20%26%20Liberties%20Banner.jpg

  • It is probably no coincidence that when you examine the recent rash of police killings, you find that the offenses the victims were initially stopped for were preposterously minor.
  • The dangers of turning police officers into revenue generators.
  • Related: To the 4 White Male Policemen Who Beat Me for Checking the Health of a Sick Black Man in Their Custody … 

Jack Hitt, Mother Jones

http://www.motherjones.com/files/imagecache/top-of-content-image/shakedown-2000x1124.jpg Owen Freeman

September/October, 2015 | In April, several days after North Charleston, South Carolina, police officer Michael Slager stopped Walter Scott for a busted taillight and then fatally shot him, the usual cable-news transmogrification of victim into superpredator ran into problems. The dash cam showed Scott being pulled over while traveling at a nerdy rate of speed, using his left turn signal to pull into a parking lot and having an amiable conversation with Slager until he realized he'd probably get popped for nonpayment of child support. At which point he bolted out of the car and hobbled off. Slager then shot him. Why didn't the cop just jog up and grab him? Calling what the obese 50-year-old Scott was doing "running" really stretches the bounds of literary license.

But maybe the question to ask is: Why did Scott run? The answer came when the New York Times revealed Scott to be a man of modest means trapped in an exhausting hamster wheel: He would get a low-paying job, make some child support payments, fall behind on them, get fined, miss a payment, get jailed for a few weeks, lose that job due to absence, and then start over at a lower-paying job. From all apparent evidence, he was a decent schlub trying to make things work in a system engineered to make his life miserable and recast his best efforts as criminal behavior.

Jack Hitt is a contributing writer for Mother Jones, a nonprofit independent journal.

Full story … 

Related:

http://www.evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/twitter-4-512.png Now you can follow Evergreene Digest on Twitter.

 

 


To the 4 White Male Policemen Who Beat Me for Checking the Health of a Sick Black Man in Their Custody … , Ali Afshar, Human Development Project / Portside

Because pick on schizophrenics, you are picking on me.

 

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

Pages

Subscribe to Law &amp; Justice