You are here

Law & Justice

Ending the Death Penalty

  • In Jesus’ justice system, offenders are allowed to live and are called to conversion.  They are encouraged to rehabilitate, and are held accountable.  
  • There is no death penalty, because the death penalty is an act that says, “There is nothing more that God can do with this life."
  • American Prisons: Slavery By The Backdoor    

Eric DeBode, Catholic Agitator 

 

This article is made possible with the generous contributions of all reader supported Evergreene Digest readers like you. Thank you!

 

October, 2012 | The story of Zacchaeus sums up many key themes which run through Luke’s gospel:  the high are brought low, the lost sheep are gathered, justice happens outside of court by repairing harms done, the “child of Abraham” is welcomed back, and the outsider and the unclean are recognized as key to the project of salvation. 

   

Zacchaeus was a chief tax collector, which meant that he got really rich by running a shady business; he collected taxes for the occupying Roman state, and he was despised by his fellow Jews. 

   

Full story...

 

Related:

 

American Prisons: Slavery By The Backdoor, Chris Gambrell, YouTube

The government will keep inventing more laws to make criminals out of good people.

 

 

American Prisons: Slavery By The Backdoor

The government will keep inventing more laws to make criminals out of good people.

Chris Gambrell, YouTube

 

This article is made possible with the generous contributions of all reader supported Evergreene Digest readers like you. Thank you!

 

Dec 31, 2012 | American prisoners produce:

  • 100% of all military helmets, ammunition belts, ID tags etc. for the
  • military
  • 93% of all domestically produced paints
  • 36% of domestically produced home appliances
  • 21% of office furniture
  • 1 out of 30 US men aged 20-34 are behind bars (For black men of the same age group, it's 1 out 9)

Full story...

 

Related:

 

Prison slave labour in AmericaYouTube

Dec 31, 2012 | The government will keep inventing more laws to make criminals out of good people. What is legal today will become a crime tomorrow. From the view of the control freaks the prison system is for all of the people!

 

 

 

 

 

Judge On Rape Victim: The Female Body "Will Not Permit That To Happen... She Didn't Put Up A Fight."

  • Judge Johnson's appalling lack of empathy proves he has no right to preside over sex crime cases -- and his archaic definition of "rape" proves he has no place on the bench. 
  • Legitimate Rape Is Back
  • Todd Akin: It's Not a War on Women, It's a War on Critical Thinking and Democracy
  • Tell the California Commission: Get Judge Johnson to step down, NOW!

Melanie Jones, Watchdog.net 

 

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to all reader-supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button above—so we can bring you more just like it.

 

January 2, 2012 | Back in 2008, California Judge Derek Johnson was overseeing the case of a man who raped his ex-girlfriend and forced her to perform oral sex on him. This was the judge's response.

 

"If someone doesn't want to have sexual intercourse, the body shuts down. The body will not permit that to happen unless a lot of damage is inflicted... That tells me that the victim in this case, although she wasn't necessarily willing, she didn't put up a fight."

 

Tell the California Commission: Get Judge Johnson to step down, NOW! 

 

 

Full story...

 

Related:

 

Legitimate Rape Is Back, Progress Report, ThinkProgress

  • Republicans Signal New Support for Disgraced Candidate
  • With their chances of taking the Senate looking more and more unlikely by the day, it appears Republicans don’t think Akin and his outrageously offensive comments are so bad after all.
  • Republican Judge: If You Don’t Want To Get Sexually Assaulted Then You Should Stay Home

Todd Akin: It's Not a War on Women, It's a War on Critical Thinking and Democracy, Soraya Chemaly, Huffington Post 

  • What Todd Akin said and believes doesn't just play into a media-catchy, election year "war on women" narrative. It's part of a reactionary, fundamentalist backlash to modernity. It's a war on science. It's a war on facts. It's a war on critical thinking. 
  • Wisconsin Bill Claims Single Moms Cause Child Abuse by Not Being Married

 

 

The Final Battle

  • Now that Congress and the White House have turned their backs on the right to due process and trial by jury, the courts are the last line of defense against establishment of a gulag state. 
  • Noam Chomsky | The Shredding of Our Constitutional Rights
  • Chris Hedges on the NDAA

Chris Hedges, TruthDig

 

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to all reader-supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button above—so we can bring you more just like it.

 

December 23, 2012 | Over the past year I and other plaintiffs including Noam Chomsky and Daniel Ellsberg have pressed a lawsuit in the federal courts to nullify Section 1021(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). This egregious section, which permits the government to use the military to detain U.S. citizens, strip them of due process and hold them indefinitely in military detention centers, could have been easily fixed by Congress. The Senate and House had the opportunity this month to include in the 2013 version of the NDAA an unequivocal statement that all U.S. citizens would be exempt from 1021(b)(2), leaving the section to apply only to foreigners. But restoring due process for citizens was something the Republicans and the Democrats, along with the White House, refused to do. The fate of some of our most basic and important rights—ones enshrined in the Bill of Rights as well as the Fourth and Fifth amendments of the Constitution—will be decided in the next few months in the courts. If the courts fail us, a gulag state will be cemented into place.

 

Full story...

 

Related:

 

Noam Chomsky | The Shredding of Our Constitutional Rights, Part 2, Noam ChomskyGuardian UK,

  • How the Magna Carta became a Minor Carta
  • The Obama administration has perpetuated an assault on the foundations of traditional liberties
  • Noam Chomsky | The Shredding of Our Constitutional Rights, Part 1

 

 

Remove a Stain on the Supreme Court by Impeaching Justice Scalia

  • He’s been off the rails for years, but the justice’s latest outburst regarding homosexuality should be the last straw: it’s time for Congress to kick him out.
  • Impeach Justice Antonin Scalia

 

David R. Dow, Daily Beast

 

December 14, 2012 | By now it is well-known that Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia thinks homosexuality is immoral. In responding to a student during a talk at Princeton earlier this week, he said homosexuality is immoral in the same way that murder is immoral.

 

Ever the lawyer, Scalia was careful to say he does not think they are equivalent—of course not! The two thoughts just happened to occur close together in his head, and so he said them. So, in other words, Scalia may agree that killing someone of the same (or opposite) sex is worse than loving someone of the same sex; but of course, murder is also worse than robbery and rape. What they all have in common, in the worldview of Antonin Scalia, is they are immoral. 

 

Full story...

 

Related:

 

Michael Tomasky | Scalia Is Just a Bigot, Michael Tomasky, the Daily Beast

  • Tomasky writes: "Wrapping opposition to same-sex marriage today or interracial marriage then in a religious blanket--or, in this case, a fancy jurisprudential one--is not okay. It was bigotry then, and it's bigtory now, pure and simple." 
  • Does Clarence Thomas Care About Prosecutors Behaving Badly?

Impeach Justice Antonin Scalia, SignOn.org

  • By his willful actions, Justice Antonin Scalia has violated his Oath of Office and the Judicial Code of Conduct Canons 2 and 5. 
  • Justice Antonin Scalia must be impeached and removed from office.

 

Michael Tomasky | Scalia Is Just a Bigot

  • Tomasky writes: "Wrapping opposition to same-sex marriage today or interracial marriage then in a religious blanket--or, in this case, a fancy jurisprudential one--is not okay. It was bigotry then, and it's bigtory now, pure and simple." 
  • Does Clarence Thomas Care About Prosecutors Behaving Badly?

Michael Tomasky, the Daily Beast

 

Submitted by Evergreene Digest Contributing Editor Jim Fuller

 

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to all-reader supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button in the above right-hand corner—so we can bring you more just like it.

 

TPM's Sahil Kapur recalls the great man's reaction to the Lawrence v. Texas, ruling, as we reflect on the recent news that the Court will hear two gay-marriage cases:

 

In a landmark 2003 decision, the Court ruled that states may not outlaw sodomy among consenting adults of the same sex. The minority dissent in the 6-3 ruling in Lawrence v. Texas was authored by Justice Scalia, who argued that the Court’s reasoning effectively, if not explicitly, knocked down the legal basis for outlawing gay marriage.

 

Full story...

 

Related:

 

Does Clarence Thomas Care About Prosecutors Behaving Badly? Adam Serwer, Mother Jones

  • The more prosecutors feel like they can get away with railroading defendants, the more they're likely to do it, and the more likely an innocent person is to be punished. The possibility isn't an abstract one.
  • The prosecutors' behavior in the Smith case was so egregious that even Thomas' conservative colleagues were unwilling to join him this time around in upholding the original verdict.
  • Clarence Thomas is not above the law

 

 

US detained hundreds of Afghan teenagers

  • The teens had not been charged with any crimes, but were each held for an average of one year for the sole purpose of preventing “a combatant from returning to the battlefield”, the report (to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child) said. 
  • The US Military Approves Bombing Children
  • US DOJ Alleges Mississippi County Jails Kids for School Dress Code Violations, Tardiness

RT.com 

 

Submitted by Evergreene Digest Assistant Editor Jeanette Eastman

 

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to all-reader supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button in the above right-hand corner—so we can bring you more just like it.

 

A US captain is silhouetted as he looks on during a media tour of Bagram prison, north of Kabul.(AFP Photo / Massoud Hossaini)

 

The US military said it has captured more than 200 Afghan juveniles, whose average age is 16, and held them prisoner for about one year without charging them for any crimes.

 

A report to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child said that more than 200 detainees under the age of 18 were held at a military prison at the Detention Facility in Parwan for being characterized as “enemy combatants”.

 

Full story...

 

Related:

 

The US Military Approves Bombing Children, Robert Dreyfuss, Nation

  • Some Afghan kids aren’t bystanders
  • If Our Drones Are So Accurate, Why Do Their Missiles Keep Hitting Children? 
  • Obama's Drone Presidency
  • There must be accountability for US drone strikes

US DOJ Alleges Mississippi County Jails Kids for School Dress Code Violations, Tardiness, Nicole Flatow, Think Progress 

  • Once those children are in the juvenile justice system, they are denied basic constitutional rights.
  • School District: 12-Year-Old "Was Herself Responsible" For Being Raped
  • Poor Kids

 

 

US DOJ Alleges Mississippi County Jails Kids for School Dress Code Violations, Tardiness

  • Once those children are in the juvenile justice system, they are denied basic constitutional rights.
  • School District: 12-Year-Old "Was Herself Responsible" For Being Raped
  • Poor Kids

Nicole Flatow, Think Progress

 

This article is made possible with the generous contributions of all reader supported Evergreene Digest readers like you. Thank you!

 

Nov 27, 2012 | In Meridian, Miss., it is school officials – not police – who determine who should be arrested. Schools seeking to discipline students call the police, and police policy is to arrest all children referred to the agency, according to a Department of Justice lawsuit. The result is a perverse system that funnels children as young as ten who merely misbehave in class into juvenile detention centers without basic constitutional procedures. The lawsuit, which follows unsuccessful attempts to negotiate with the county, challenges the constitutionality of punishing children “so arbitrarily and severely as to shock the conscience” and alleging that the city’s police department acts as a de facto “taxi service” in shuttling students from school to juvenile detention centers. Colorlines explains:

 

Once those children are in the juvenile justice system, they are denied basic constitutional rights. They are handcuffed and incarcerated for days without any hearing and subsequently warehoused without understanding their alleged probation violations.

 

Full story...

 

Related:

 

School District: 12-Year-Old "Was Herself Responsible" For Being Raped, Melanie Jones, Watchdog.net 

  • Tell Moraga School District: 12-Year-Old Girls Aren't "Responsible" For Being Raped!
  • Don't let Minnesota priests use sacraments as political weapons

Poor Kids, Frontline, PBS

  • Frontline explores the economic crisis as it's rarely seen - through the eyes of children. 
  • What poverty means to children and to the country’s future.

 

 

 

Pages

Subscribe to Law & Justice