You are here

Peace & Nonviolence

Trump’s Proposed Increase in U.S. Defense Spending Would Be 80 Percent of Russia’s Entire Military Budget

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Soldiers%20Marching%20in%20Parade.jpg

At a meeting of U.S. governors on Monday, Trump described his forthcoming budget proposal as “a public safety and national security budget.”

Alex Emmons, the Intercept

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Subscribe%20logo.jpg To stay on top of important articles like these, sign up here to receive the latest updates from all reader supported Evergreene Digest.

 


https://riseuptimes.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/if-war-is-the-answer.jpg?w=540  February 27 2017 | The U.S. Government already spends $600 billion dollars a year on its military — more money than the next seven biggest spenders combined, including China and Russia.

On Monday, the White House said it would request $54 billion more in military spending for next year. That increase alone is roughly the size of the entire annual military budget of the United Kingdom, the fifth-largest spending country, and it’s more than 80 percent of Russia’s entire military budget in 2015.

If Congress were to follow Trump’s blueprint, the U.S. military budget could account for nearly 40 percent of global military spending next year. The U.S. would be outspending Russia by a margin of greater than 9 to 1.

 

 

 

Alex Emmons is a reporter covering national security, foreign affairs, human rights, and politics. Prior to joining The Intercept, he worked for Amnesty International and the ACLU on their campaigns against targeted killing, mass surveillance, and Guantánamo Bay.

 
 

Full story … 

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

Liberal War Addiction

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Lady%20Liberty.jpg

Peter Levelle, RT 

  • 24 Feb, 2017  | For many, we live in a world turned upside down. Traditional political divides are now blurry, and traditional political labels rendered meaningless. Today it’s liberalism that shows itself to be intolerant and decidedly pro-war. CrossTalking with Sara Flounders, John Walsh, and Mohammad Marandi.
  • Related: John Pilger | Obama’s Legacy–One of The Most Violent Presidents

Peter Levelle: American journalist, host of CrossTalk, a current affairs debate television program on RT

Full story (video) ... 

Related:

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Donate%20Now%20%28Green%29.jpg Journalism with real independence and integrity is a rare thing. All reader supported Evergreene Digest relies - exclusively!- on reader donations. Click on the donation button above to make a contribution and support our work.

John Pilger | Obama’s Legacy–One of The Most Violent Presidents, John Pilger, Dandelion Salad

https://c4.staticflickr.com/4/3064/2398383691_befcd81881_o.jpg IImage by Ben Salter via Flickr

Renowned journalist, film-maker and author John Pilger gives RT his view on the future of US-Russia relations.

January 16, 2017 |  Renowned journalist, film-maker and author John Pilger gives RT his view on the future of US-Russia relations.

John Pilger: Renowned journalist, film-maker and author 

Full story (video) … 

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

 

Challenging Klobuchar on Ukraine War

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Foreign%20Policy%20Banner.jpg

As Democrats compete to become the new War Party – pushing for a dangerous confrontation with nuclear-armed Russia – some constituents are objecting, as Mike Madden did in a letter to Sen. Amy Klobuchar.

Mike Madden (of St. Paul, Minnesota), Consortiumnews.com

http://www.evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/twitter-4-512.png Now you can follow Evergreene Digest on Twitter.

 


Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesotahttps://consortiumnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/AJK_Twitter-1-300x300.jpg

February 19, 2017 | Dear Senator Klobuchar, I write with concern over statements you have made recently regarding Russia. These statements have been made both at home and abroad, and they involve two issues; the alleged Russian hack of the presidential election and Russia’s actions in the aftermath of the February 22, 2014 coup in Kiev.

U.S. intelligence services allege that President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign to denigrate Hillary Clinton and help elect Donald Trump. The campaign is purported to include the production of fake news, cyber-trolling, and propaganda from Russian state-owned media. It is also alleged that Russia hacked the email accounts of the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, subsequently providing the emails to WikiLeaks.

Full story … 

Related:

http://media.cagle.com/228/2017/01/15/190166_600.jpg  The Dangers of Democratic Party's Putin-bashing after German Intel Cleared Russia on Election Interference, Compiled by David Culver, Ed., Evergreene Digest 

  • Part 1: German Intel Clears Russia on Interference
  • Mainstream U.S. media only wants stories of Russian perfidy, so when German intelligence cleared Moscow of suspected subversion of German democracy, the silence was deafening, says ex-CIA analyst Ray McGovern.
  • Part 2: Dangers of Democratic Putin-Bashing
  • Exclusive: As national Democratic leaders continue to blame Russian President Putin for their 2016 defeat, they’re leading their party into a realignment with the neocons and other war hawks.

###

The Fast Track to Armageddon, Louis René Beres, US News

Could President Trump propel a nuclear war in the Middle East?

 

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

 

The Fast Track to Armageddon

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Foreign%20Policy%20Banner.jpg

Could President Trump propel a nuclear war in the Middle East?

Louis René Beres, US News 

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Reader%20Supported%20News%20donate%20graphic.jpgIf you like reading this article, consider joining the crew of all reader-supported Evergreene Digest by contributing the equivalent of a cafe latte a month--using the donation button in the above right-hand corner—so we can bring you more just like it.



 

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Bomb%20with%20US%20Flag.jpg "He's going to get us all killed." --Michael Moore

Feb. 10, 2017 | "Should the enemy make a mistake, our roaring missiles will rain down on them." – IRGC Iran Air Force Commander, General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, Feb. 4, 2017

When all pertinent factors are taken into account, U.S. President Donald Trump could sometime undertake more-or-less selective military action against Iran. In response, the Islamic Republic – then having absolutely no meaningful option to launching at least certain forms of armed reprisal – would target American military forces in the region and/or carefully chosen Israeli targets. Whatever its precise configuration of selected targets, Tehran's retaliatory blow would be expressly designed so as not to elicit an unacceptably massive (possibly even nuclear) counter-retaliation. With particular regard to Israel, moreover, this sort of retaliation would plausibly include, inter alia, a substantial reliance upon Iran's own surrogate militia forces in Hezbollah.

All such bewildering calculations, of course, must assume perfect rationality on all sides. If, for example, the new American president should cast all caution to the winds with his own first strike (a strike that would be defended by Washington, in law, as an allegedly legitimate expression of international law-enforcement, or "anticipatory self-defense"), the Iranian response, whether rational or irrational, could expectedly be "proportionate" – that is, comparably massive. In that prospectively escalatory case, any contemplated introduction of nuclear weapons into the ensuing conflagration might not necessarily be dismissed out of hand.

Louis René Beres, Contributor, US News

Full story … 

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

First on the White House agenda – the collapse of the global order. Next, war?

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Foreign%20Policy%20Banner.jpg

  • Trump’s allies yearn to wreck alliances that have kept the peace for decades. Progressives must preserve them
  • Related: Series | The Obama Legacy, Part 2: Barack Obama Expanded The Presidential War Powers He Once Vowed To Limit

Jonathan Freedland, the Guardian

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Subscribe%20logo.jpgTo stay on top of important articles like these, sign up here to receive the latest updates from all reader supported Evergreene Digest

 



 

Illustration by Robert G Fresson

https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/6d62fea8f338f9680817c822a8a1f171d2f44168/0_0_2560_1536/master/2560.jpg?w=780&q=55&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&s=8ba4f4a98de88af52b1ff8251e78eed0

Saturday, 4 February 2017 | Donald Trump doesn’t read books. He leaves that to his chief strategist, Steve Bannon, the man rapidly emerging as the true power behind the gaudy Trump throne. Given Bannon’s influence – he is the innermost member of the president’s inner circle and will have a permanent seat on the National Security Council, a privilege Trump has denied the head of the US military – it’s worth taking a good look at the books on his bedside table.

Close to the top of the pile, according to this week’s Time magazine, is a book called The Fourth Turning, which argues that human history moves in 80- to 100-year cycles, each one climaxing in a violent cataclysm that destroys the old order and replaces it with something new. For the US, there have been three such upheavals: the founding revolutionary war that ended in 1783, the civil war of the 1860s and the second world war of the 1940s. According to the book, America is on the brink of another.

Jonathan Freedland is a weekly columnist and writer for the Guardian <>. He is also a regular contributor to the New York Review of Books and presents BBC Radio 4's contemporary history series, The Long View. In 2014 he was awarded the Orwell special prize for journalism. 

Full story … 

Related: 

Series | The Obama Legacy, Part 2: Barack Obama Expanded The Presidential War Powers He Once Vowed To Limit, Jessica Schulberg, the Huffington Post

http://i.guim.co.uk/media/w-860/h--/q-95/1eacd6272bf6387a1244162911c7211474a3fc73/336_385_2027_1215/1000.jpg

 

  • Now he's handing them over to Donald Trump.
  • This piece is Part 2 of a series on Obama’s legacy that Evergreene Digest  will be publishing over the next weeks. 

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

 

German Academics Pen Open Letter Slamming Western Interpretation of Syria Crisis

https://cdn1.img.sputniknews.com/images/104035/29/1040352922.jpg

Called “a statement on the Syrian war,” the declaration was written by the scientific advisory board of the German branch of Attac, an international organization that campaigns for alternatives to globalization.

Biomorphic, Make Wars History

http://fair.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/AdFree2.jpg

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Bomb%20with%20US%20Flag.jpgJanuary 28, 2017 | In contrast to the West, which has been intent on destroying Syria and other Middle Eastern countries, Russia and Iran are playing a constructive role in preventing the overthrow of Assad and the formation of a fundamentalist Sunni government in the country, a group of German academics have written in an open letter.

A group of German university professors have penned a joint statement criticizing the mainstream media’s portrayal of the roles of Russia and Iran in regulation of the Syrian conflict, Sputnik Deutschland reported.

Biomorphic: Contributor to Make Wars History

Full story … 

Series | The Obama Legacy, Part 2: Barack Obama Expanded The Presidential War Powers He Once Vowed To Limit

http://i.guim.co.uk/media/w-860/h--/q-95/1eacd6272bf6387a1244162911c7211474a3fc73/336_385_2027_1215/1000.jpg

  • Now he's handing them over to Donald Trump.
  • This piece is Part 2 of a series on Obama’s legacy that Evergreene Digest  will be publishing over the next weeks. 

Jessica Schulberg, the Huffington Post

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Subscribe%20logo.jpg To stay on top of important articles like these, sign up here to receive the latest updates from all reader supported Evergreene Digest

 



 

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Bomb%20with%20US%20Flag.jpg01/09/2017 | A little more than halfway through his presidency, Barack Obama visited the National Defense University in Washington, D.C., to give a speech outlining how he would restrict his own power to use drones to target and kill individuals far from traditional battlefields.

Obama acknowledged public concern around drone strikes and announced stricter standards on their use. The new rules, Obama said, codified “clear guidelines, oversight and accountability.” But they were policy, not law. They didn’t bind him and couldn’t bind future presidents. Americans, it seemed, would have to trust that the president and his successors would follow the rules he created.

Jessica Schulberg, Foreign Affairs Reporter, the Huffington Post

Full story … 

Previously in this series:

Part 1: Barack Obama’s Foreign Policy Leaves Behind An Uneasy World

 

Pages

Subscribe to Peace &amp; Nonviolence