You are here

A Green New Deal Is Not possible Until We Let ALL Our Delusions About Climate Change Die.

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Environment%20Banner_1.jpg

  • Part 1: You, Too, Are in Denial of Climate Change
  • Thinking climate change will only hit elsewhere, or only in the future, pummeling others but sparing you — these are delusions, too.
  • Part 2: Is a Green New Deal Possible Without a Revolution?
  • A Green New Deal is the name of our desire.

Compiled by David Culver, Ed., Evergreene Digest

 


http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/If%20You%20Use%20it%2C%20Contribute%20To%20It%20banner.jpg




Part 1: You, Too, Are in Denial of Climate Change

https://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intelligencer/2018/12/13/13-climate-change-protest.w700.h467.jpg / A woman at a June 1, 2017, demonstration in New York protesting President Trump’s decision to pull out of the Paris climate accords. Photo: Jewel Samad/AFP/Getty Images

Thinking climate change will only hit elsewhere, or only in the future, pummeling others but sparing you — these are delusions, too, ones powered by many of the same coping mechanisms that give rise to outright denialism.

David Wallace-Wells, New York Magazine

Dec. 14, 2018 | You, too, are in denial.

We all are, nearly every single one of us as individuals, even those of us who are following the bad news that suggests “the climate change problem is starting to look too big to solve”; every nation, almost none of them meeting their climate commitments, and most (not just the United States) publicly downplaying the threat; and even many of the alliances and organizations, like the IPCC, endeavoring to solve the crisis. At the moment, negotiations at the organization’s COP24 conference, meant to formalize the commitments made in the Paris accords two years ago, are “a huge mess,” perhaps poised to collapse. Last month, scientists warned that we had only about 12 years to cut global emissions in half and that doing so would require a worldwide mobilization on the scale of that for World War II. The U.N. secretary general has warned that we have only about a year to get started. Instead, on Election Day, voters in deep-blue Washington rejected a modest carbon tax and those in crunchy Colorado rejected a slowdown of oil and gas projects. In France — conservative America’s cartoon of unchecked left-wing-ism — the worst protests in 50 years were provoked by a proposal to increase the gasoline tax. If communities like these won’t take action on climate, who, in the next dozen years, will?

But perhaps it should not be surprising that, even in many of the world’s most progressive places, even in the moment of acknowledged environmental crisis, a sort of climate NIMBYism prevails. The cost of inaction is sort of unthinkable — annual deadly heat waves and widespread famine, tens of millions of climate refugees, global coastal flooding, and disasters that will cost double the world’s present-day wealth. And so we choose, most of the time, not to think about it. This is denial, too, whatever you check on a survey about whether you “believe” the climate is changing.

David Wallace-Wells, New York Magazine , National Fellow, New America, is deputy editor of New York Magazine, where he also writes frequently about climate and the near future of science and technology, including his widely read and debated 2017 cover story on worst-case scenarios for global warming.

Full story …



Part 2: Is a Green New Deal Possible Without a Revolution?


https://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intelligencer/2018/12/11/11-green-new-deal.w700.h467.jpg / A Green New Deal is the name of our desire. Photo: Michael Brochstein/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

Eric Levitz, New York Magazine

Dec. 13, 2018 | Frederick Douglass wasn’t exaggerating: Power really does concede nothing without a demand — not even a plan to make a plan to prevent the powerful’s own grandkids from perishing in the end-times.

As of few weeks ago, congressional Democrats had no clear vision for how they intended to develop a clear vision for tackling climate change. The party’s leading 2020 contenders had put forward ambitious policies on health care, housing, criminal justice, the racial wealth gap, child care, wage stagnation, corporate governance reform, and legal ganja — but virtually nothing on the small issue of how to ensure that human civilization outlives Barron Trump.

Eric Levitz: I'm an aspiring journalist, currently studying at the CUNY School of Journalism. Have written for MSNBC, Salon, Heavy, City Limits.

Full story …

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Editor%20Comment%20icon_0.jpg

Be sure to pass these articles to friends and kin. A lot depends on this. Please do your part.