You are here

Nothin’ but Debt: Which NCAA Tournament Schools Give Low-Income Students the Best Shot?

 

http://media.salon.com/2017/03/march-madness-620x412.jpg

(Credit: Getty/Al Bello) 

So who fares well in this tournament?

Mike Tigas and Olga Pierce, ProPublica  

March 16, 2017 | We used federal data to create an NCAA Tournament bracket based on five factors that measure each school’s ability to graduate low-income students with little debt: the percentage of undergraduates from low-income households, the average financial support given to those students, the tuition discount that those students receive, their post-graduation debt, and the percentage of those students who are unable to pay back their loans after graduation.

Click any game in the bracket below to view more information on how both schools fare in each Debt by Degrees head-to-head matchup. You can also compare any two schools by clicking here.

 

Mike Tigas is a News Applications Developer at ProPublica. He also works on tools for online privacy and the liberation of public data.

Olga Pierce is the Deputy Data Editor. Previously, she was a reporter at ProPublica, specializing in data-driven stories.

Full story … 

Related:

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/I%20Want%20You%20with%2011%20Yr%20Banner.jpg If you like reading this article, consider joining the crew of all reader-supported Evergreene Digest by contributing the equivalent of a cafe latte a month--using the donation button above—so we can bring you more just like it.

 

 





 

March Madness and money: Should American universities spend so much serious cash on sports? David MasciotraSalon

  • Most college athletic programs are a financial burden to their schools. As higher ed costs increase, why keep them?
  • Related: From the Archives | The Problem with Subsidizing Huge Stadiums for Billionaire Team Owners