You are here

We know how to end poverty, so why don't we?

Section(s): 

https://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/O8AeZ6t84j6SvLIoHTZejO5yZi4=/0x0:750x422/920x0/filters:focal(0x0:750x422):no_upscale()/cdn3.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/2458308/givethemmoney.0.gif

  • The video above details the the history behind basic income proposals, why policymakers moved away from the idea, and why it might be worth taking another look.
  • Related: Reframing the Minimum-Wage Debate

Dylan Matthews, Vox 

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Money%20Pie.jpg November 14, 2016 | In theory, ending poverty is simple: the government could just give everyone enough money such that no one's poor anymore. That may sound too clever by half, but the idea — known as a "basic income" — has a long intellectual pedigree, and the case for it is better than you might expect. A limited version of it even passed the House of Representatives in 1970.

The video above details the the history behind basic income proposals, why policymakers moved away from the idea, and why it might be worth taking another look.

To learn more, check out our basic income explainer.

Dylan Matthews: Minister without portfolio. Forget it, Jake, it's the ARPAnet. Here is a novel about me.

Full story … 

Related:

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/PineTreeLogo%20%28Green%29.JPG  Producing in-depth, thoughtful journalism for a better world is expensive – but supporting us isn’t. If you value ad-free independent journalism, consider supporting Evergreene Digest today.

In earnest,

Dave & the Crew



http://prospect.org/sites/default/files/styles/longform_cover_image/public/ap955555990903_banner.jpeg?itok=wwDP-bNR

Reframing the Minimum-Wage Debate, David Howell, the American Prospect

Why “no job loss” is the wrong standard for setting the right wage floor.

Full story ...

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png