You are here

Government & Politics

Government Logo

Actresses—and Millions of Other Workers—Have No Federal Sexual-Harassment Protections

https://www.thenation.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Women-in-Hollywood-2009-rtr-img.jpg?scale=896&compress=80

Actresses present the award for best actress at the Academy Awards in Hollywood, California, on February 22, 2009. (Reuters / Gary Hershom)

  • This is another reason Harvey Weinstein’s accusers may have kept quiet until now.
  • Related: Sexual harassment, assault: Change the story. 

Bryce Covert, the Nation

October 19, 2017 | After The New York Times dropped its bombshell investigation into decades of sexual harassment perpetrated by film producer Harvey Weinstein, and The New Yorker followed up with allegations of not just harassment but sexual assault, dozens of women in Hollywood have come forward with stories about his harassment and abuse. But until these articles were published, Weinstein faced few repercussions for his behavior.

There are a number of reasons most of these women may have decided against reporting what happened to them. Many actresses talked about their fear that Weinstein would exact retribution by blacklisting them in the industry—something some victims said they experienced simply for rebuffing his advances. They likely worried that no one would believe them or take them seriously. One of the few women who did report his behavior to the authorities, Italian model Ambra Battilana Gutierrez, even wore a wiretap and caught Weinstein apparently admitting to assaulting her, only to watch Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. drop her case over what he said was lack of evidence supporting a criminal charge.

http://www.thenation.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/brycecovert_small1.jpg Bryce Covert is a contributor at the Nation and a contributing op-ed writer at the New York Times. Her writing has also appeared in other recognized publications, and she won a 2016 Exceptional Merit in Media Award from the National Women’s Political Caucus.

Full story … 

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Have%20You%20No%20Shame%20with%2011%20Yr%20Banner%20alt.jpgRelated:

Sexual harassment, assault: Change the story, Mariam Williams, National Catholic Reporter 

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Women%27s%20March%2C%20KC%2C%20MO%2C%20Jan.%2021%2C%202016.jpg Participants at the Women's March, Kansas City, Missouri, Jan. 21, 2016 (NCR photo/George Goss)

  • We're not far from the scary world of "The Handmaid's Tale," but we don't have to keep repeating the story. Men in power can demonstrate that women are equal. They can call other men to examine masculinity. They can accept that women and men both desire sex and can control their urges. We can talk about crimes of power and the crime of silence among those who hold it. We can change.
  • Related: From the Archives | Let’s Stop Referring to Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault as ‘Women’s Issues’

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Editor%20Comment%20icon.jpg
No Peace! No Justice!  Please share this post.

Al Franken has to go

http://api.theweek.com/sites/default/files/styles/tw_image_9_4/public/RTX3228C.jpg?itok=xuw2pWPW&resize=1260x560

(This) is the final reason to ax Franken: to set an example. If we as a people demonstrate that this sort of behavior means an instant end to one's political career, future up-and-coming politicos — and the broader population in general — might just internalize the lesson, and stop abusing people.

Ryan Cooper, The Week

Never Miss Another Story



November 16, 2017 | On Thursday morning, Los Angeles-area radio host Leeann Tweeden accused Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) of sexually harassing her on a USO tour in 2006. She alleges that Franken wrote a skit in which she was supposed to kiss him, and then pressured her into "practicing" the routine, during which he forcibly kissed her. Then, while Tweeden was asleep on the flight back home, Franken posed for a horrifying picture where he appears to touch her flak jacket over her breasts.

Franken issued an apology, and when that was widely condemned, issued another one, admitting that the picture was "completely inappropriate," and agreeing to subject himself to an ethics investigation.

Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at The Week. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.

Full story … 
http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

 

Don’t Leave Health Care to a Free Market

Paul Ryan, the speaker of the House, at the Capitol last month. Credit Jim Lo Scalzo/European Pressphoto Agency

Republicans, and many Democrats, need to be honest with themselves and the public: If they want medicine to be truly free-market, then they have to be willing to let the next man or woman they find lying unconscious in the street remain there and die.

Farzon A. Nahvi, New York (NY) Times

July 10, 2017 | When it comes to health care coverage, House Speaker Paul Ryan says, “We’re going to have a free market, and you buy what you want to buy,” and if people don’t want it, “then they won’t buy it.” In this model of health care, the patient is consumer, and he must decide whether the goods and services he wants to protect his life are worth the cost.

But this is often impossible. And what Republicans, and many Democrats, forget to stress, is that in a totally free market health care system, you must be willing to let some patients die.

Farzon A. Nahvi, New York (NY) Times Op-Ed Contributor,  is an emergency medicine physician and an instructor of emergency medicine in New York City.

Full story … 

Related:

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Support%20Independent%20Media_0.jpg   Journalism with real independence and integrity is a rare thing. All reader supported Evergreene Digest relies - exclusively!- on reader donations. Click on the donation button above  to make a contribution and support our work.



How Single-Payer Will Be Achieved, Antonio Balmer, the Socialist Revolution

https://wp.socialistrevolution.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/marchers_medicare-for-all-e1508447687257.jpgThough such reforms are now considered common sense, the Democrats can't and won't deliver. Only a mass independent political force—with single payer placed at the top of its agenda—is capable of winning this fight. 

 

How Single-Payer Will Be Achieved

https://wp.socialistrevolution.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/marchers_medicare-for-all-e1508447687257.jpg

Though such reforms are now considered common sense, the Democrats can't and won't deliver. Only a mass independent political force—with single payer placed at the top of its agenda—is capable of winning this fight. 

Antonio Balmer, the Socialist Revolution

Submitted by Evergreene Digest Contributing Editor John Stoltenberg 

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Twitter%20Logo%20%28125%29.jpg Now you can follow Evergreene Digest on Twitter.

 



October 19, 2017 | “A political struggle is in its essence a struggle of interests and forces, not of arguments.” —Trotsky, Revolution Betrayed

Firing the opening shot in his new offensive in the battle for single-payer, Bernie Sanders presented his open-and-shut case in a New York Times Op-Ed piece:


“Do we, as a nation, join the rest of the industrialized world and guarantee comprehensive healthcare to every person as a human right? Or do we maintain a system that is enormously expensive, wasteful and bureaucratic, and is designed to maximize profits for big insurance companies, the pharmaceutical industry, Wall Street and medical equipment suppliers?”

Although every sector of the capitalist economy without exception can be described as “enormously expensive, wasteful and bureaucratic, and designed to maximize profits for big [companies and] Wall Street,” the US healthcare crisis is unrivalled in its glaring absurdity as an expression of capitalism’s historical impasse. With annual revenues of $3.3 trillion, the healthcare industry accounts for nearly a fifth of US GDP.

Antonio Balmer writes for the Socialist Revolution the publication of the International Marxist Tendency in the United States.

Full story ... 

Related:

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Healthcare%20%26%20Money_0.jpg

How Big Medicine can ruin Medicare for all, Phillip Longman, the Guardian

‘Health care delivery in the United States a generation ago was still in many ways a cottage industry.’ Photograph: Michael Reynolds/EPA

The pursuit of a ‘single-payer’ healthcare system in the United States will degenerate into corporate welfare unless America takes on healthcare monopolies.
 

 

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/default/files/Attention%20banner.jpg

 

Help grow the movement! Share this story with your friends.

Special Report | Trump’s Dangerously Burdensome, Costly, Deregulatory, Coherent Agenda (3)

http://dy00k1db5oznd.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/FI_Tweeting-V5_1024x550-400x225.jpg

  • Part 1: Trump’s Burdensome and Costly Deregulatory Agenda
    • Trump’s willful blindness to the benefits of commonsense safeguards will lead to tremendous costs for the American people.
  • Part 2: Donald Trump’s Dangerously Coherent Agenda
    • President Trump’s disturbingly coherent agenda is based around militarism, austerity, social division, voter suppression, and right-wing authoritarianism.
  • Part 3: In Trump’s Budget, America Comes Last
    • Throwing money at the Pentagon, while cutting everywhere else, betrays the president’s promise to rebuild our country.

Compiled by David Culver, Ed., Evergreene Digest 

http://fair.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/AdFree2.jpg



Part 1: Trump’s Burdensome and Costly Deregulatory Agenda

https://cdn.americanprogress.org/content/uploads/2017/09/29052515/dereg-1024x683.jpg

Even this narrow analysis makes clear: Trump’s willful blindness to the benefits of commonsense safeguards will lead to tremendous costs for the American people.
 

Sam Berger, Center for American Progress 

October 2, 2017 | Yesterday, the White House held an event discussing the steps the Trump administration has taken to eliminate commonsense protections for consumers, workers, and the environment, as well as Trump’s plans to continue these efforts in the coming year. The Trump administration has touted lower regulatory costs, but it has ignored the effects of its policies on regulatory benefits. Discussing regulatory costs without benefits is like a business making decisions about what to produce without considering the profit from each sale: It makes no sense and leads to bad outcomes.

The administration has claimed that its deregulatory actions will save businesses $18 billion a year. But it has ignored the lost benefits from stripping away these protections. Eliminating just three regulations Trump is targeting—Waters of the United States rule, the Clean Power Plan, and the fiduciary rule—would result in $28.3 billion in lost benefits, significantly more than the supposed savings from all of Trump’s deregulatory actions. Repealing these three regulations would have an annual cost of $22.1 billion. Trump’s willful blindness to the benefits of commonsense safeguards will lead to tremendous costs for the American people's health, their financial well-being, and the environment.

Sam Berger is the senior policy adviser at American Progress. His areas of expertise include health care policy, government reform, regulatory policy, appropriations, and administrative law.

Full story … 



Part 2: Donald Trump’s Dangerously Coherent Agenda

  • President Trump’s agenda is disturbingly coherent, and it is based around militarism, austerity, social division, voter suppression, and right-wing authoritarianism.
  • While Trump tweets, rights and protections are being eroded.

Tampa Bay (FL) Times Editorial
 
Tuesday, October 10, 2017 | President Donald Trump was at it again Tuesday, battling the NFL over players standing for the national anthem and continuing his Twitter war with an influential Republican senator. That diverts attention from his administration's steady dismantling of protections for women, equal rights for the LGBT community and efforts to combat climate change. The president who as a candidate criticized President Barack Obama for changing policy by executive authority has adopted the same approach. The difference is Trump is turning back the clock to an era that was more discriminatory and less enlightened.

Within the last week, the damage has been significant. The administration issued new rules that immediately made it harder for women to get birth control by making it easier for employers to refuse to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives. One of the key provisions of the Affordable Care Act required most employers to provide workers with birth control coverage without co-payments. Unable to repeal the health care law, Trump simultaneously chips away at its benefits and tries to starve it to death.

Full story … 



Part 3: In Trump’s Budget, America Comes Last

https://www.thenation.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/trump_navy_ap_img.jpg?scale=896&compress=80 President Donald J. Trump aboard the aircraft carrier Gerald R. Ford at Newport News Shipbuilding, March 2, 2017. (AP / Steve Earley)

Throwing money at the Pentagon, while cutting everywhere else, betrays the president’s promise to rebuild our country.

Katrina vanden Heuvel, the Nation 

March 21, 2017 | President Trump’s “America First” budget is headlined by its big hike in military spending, which Trump touts as “one of the largest increases in national defense spending in American history.” The buildup is “paid for” by cuts in civilian programs, including savage cuts to the State Department, UN programs, foreign aid and the Environmental Protection Agency and anything related to climate change. In fulfilling his campaign pledge to throw money at the Pentagon, Trump is undermining his oft-promised America First foreign policy.

Trump’s budget document misleadingly claims that the “military’s depletion under President Obama is our foremost challenge.” In fact, the United States already spends nearly 40 percent of all the money spent globally on defense and more than the next 12 highest military spenders combined. (The hawkish GOP Senator John McCain of Arizona complained that Trump’s budget calls for only a 3 percent increase over Barack Obama’s last budget.) Yet on top of the billions already being poured into the military, Trump wants to add 60,000 active-duty soldiers to the Army, 78 ships and submarines to the Navy, 12,000 Marines, 1,200 active Air Force fighter planes, plus enhanced missile defense, cyber-capabilities and more.

Katrina vanden Heuvel is editor and publisher of the Nation.

Full story … 

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

Pages