You are here

Health & Environment

Health, Science & Environment

Steve Greenberg | Earth alarm / media.cagle.com

“Sniper” and the Elephant in the Room

  • Lessons From Harry Chapin’s Classic School Shooter Song
  • Brain-altering Psych Drugs as a Tipping Point to Overt Acts of Violence
  • De-mystifying the mass shootings seems to be a taboo subject 

Gary G. Kohls, MD, Duty to Warn / Evergreene Digest

This article is made possible with the generous contributions of all reader supported Evergreene Digest readers like you. Thank you!

May 17, 2013 | I have been involved in the mental ill health industry in various ways since the early 1990s. In the last decade of my medical career I was an independent holistic mental health care practitioner. I found myself frequently feeling obligated to function as a whistle-blower, exposing a psychopharmaceutical drug industry that had enormous numbers of serious, often unrecognized problems, many of them brain-disabling, addicting or even lethal.

Starting with the wake-up call of the Columbine school massacre in 1999, I became acutely aware of the close connections between the epidemic of mass shootings and the widespread use of prescription antidepressants for adolescents  (which are illegal, for good reasons, to be prescribed in the under age 18 group in Great Britain). In my study of the problem, I discovered that mass shootings escalated dramatically after Prozac, Paxil and Zoloft hit the market in the decade prior to Eric Harris was started on Zoloft and then was switched to Luvox. (See www.ssristories.com for much more on the topic of drug-induced violence.).

Full story…

Why French Kids Don't Have ADHD

  • The case against labeling and medicating children, and effective alternatives for treating them
  • Suffer the Children
  • How Schools Are Becoming Prisons

Marilyn Wedge, Ph.D., Psychology Today

Thanks to Evergreene Digest reader reader Robb Mitchell for this contribution. 

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to all-reader supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button in the above right-hand corner—so we can bring you more just like it.

March 8, 2012 | French children don't need medications to control their behavior.

In the United States, at least 9% of school-aged children have been diagnosed with ADHD, and are taking pharmaceutical medications. In France, the percentage of kids diagnosed and medicated for ADHD is less than .5%. How come the epidemic of ADHD—which has become firmly established in the United States—has almost completely passed over children in France?

Is ADHD a biological-neurological disorder? Surprisingly, the answer to this question depends on whether you live in France or in the United States. In the United States, child psychiatrists consider ADHD to be a biological disorder with biological causes. The preferred treatment is also biological--psycho stimulant medications such as Ritalin and Adderall.

Full story...

 

Related:

How Schools Are Becoming Prisons, Chase Madar, Truthdig

  • The movement is under way to expel zero tolerance and dismantle the school-to-prison pipeline led by a coalition of legal, educational and youth groups.
  • The School Security America Doesn’t Need

 

Transit for a Stronger Economy, Healthier Environment

Let's invest in a 21st-century transit system for Minnesota.  Please pass a balanced, comprehensive transportation funding package.

Sierra Club, MN Northstar Chapter

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to all reader-supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button above—so we can bring you more just like it.

This is a critical time at the MN legislature, and your voice is needed on the debate over funding for transit. A balanced, comprehensive transportation funding package will make possible the 21st century transit system we need -- to build a strong economy, reduce pollution and help decrease our dependence on dirty foreign oil.

Take action today, and ask state leaders to support a sustainable transportation future!

Full story…

The end of American science

Join us immediately in calling on the House to oppose Rep. Smith's egregious bill defunding of research, the suppression of facts, and the injection of party politics into scientific research. 

Melanie Jones, watchdog.net

Rep. Lamar Smith has drafted a bill that would replace peer review at the National Science Foundation (NSF) with a set of funding criteria chosen and overseen by Congress... and he wants to use it as a model for every federal science agency we have.

Rep. Smith's bill would force the NSF to prove the "worth" of their grants men and women who are politicians, not scientists. And take a look at two of the main points those looking for a grant need to meet: securing national defense and answering questions he feels are important to society at large.

If we sit back and let the House pass this bill, we will be handing over our scientific research to men and women whose jobs are about political bias, not objective reasoning

There's a reason no one before Rep. Smith has tried to pull this off -- because it opens the door to the defunding of research, the suppression of facts, and the injection of party politics into scientific research. Don't let him open that Pandora's box: join us in calling on the House to oppose Rep. Smith's egregious bill immediately.

Petition to my representatives:  Don't let Lamar Smith undo all the NSF has done for scientific progress. Oppose his bill to turn objective research into political fodder today.

Full story (with petition)…

Pages