You are here

Peace & Nonviolence

Peace & Nonviolence Logo

Series | A Living Earth Economy, Part 9: Want National Security? Dismantle the War Machine

  http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Gaza%20Up%20in%20US%20%26%20Israeli%20Smoke.jpg

  • A military response to violence creates more violence. For real security, we need to stop climate change and work toward shared prosperity.
  • 9th in a Series
  • Related: Trump’s Proposed Increase in U.S. Defense Spending Would Be 80 Percent of Russia’s Entire Military Budget

David Korten, Yes! Magazine

http://www.yesmagazine.org/peace-justice/a-security-strategy-for-the-21st-century-20160921/peaceday.jpg/imageSep 21, 2016 | The recent 15th anniversary of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade towers was a reminder of the terrible consequences when a nation ignores the lessons of history—including its own recent history. The U.S. military budget is a tragic example.

We currently spend roughly $598 billion on defense, which is more than the next seven biggest military spenders combined: China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, the United Kingdom, India, France, and Japan. This represents 54 percent of federal discretionary spending. In return, we get an ability to rapidly deploy conventional military power anywhere in the world.

  http://www.yesmagazine.org/new-economy/the-thing-sanders-trump-and-clinton-agree-on-its-that-bad-20160323/Korteninset.jpgDavid Korten wrote this article for YES! Magazine as part of his new series of biweekly columns on “A Living Earth Economy.” David is co-founder and board chair of YES! Magazine, president of the Living Economies Forum, co-chair of the New Economy Working Group, a member of the Club of Rome, and the author of influential books, including When Corporations Rule the World and Change the Story, Change the Future: A Living Economy for a Living Earth. His work builds on lessons from the 21 years he and his wife, Fran, lived and worked in Africa, Asia, and Latin America on a quest to end global poverty

Full story … 

Previously in this series

Related:

http://www.evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/twitter-4-512.png Now you can follow Evergreene Digest on Twitter.

 

 



Trump’s Proposed Increase in U.S. Defense Spending Would Be 80 Percent of Russia’s Entire Military Budget, Alex Emmons, the Intercept

At a meeting of U.S. governors on Monday, Trump described his forthcoming budget proposal as “a public safety and national security budget.”

 

 

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

Trump’s Proposed Increase in U.S. Defense Spending Would Be 80 Percent of Russia’s Entire Military Budget

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Soldiers%20Marching%20in%20Parade.jpg

At a meeting of U.S. governors on Monday, Trump described his forthcoming budget proposal as “a public safety and national security budget.”

Alex Emmons, the Intercept

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Subscribe%20logo.jpg To stay on top of important articles like these, sign up here to receive the latest updates from all reader supported Evergreene Digest.

 


https://riseuptimes.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/if-war-is-the-answer.jpg?w=540  February 27 2017 | The U.S. Government already spends $600 billion dollars a year on its military — more money than the next seven biggest spenders combined, including China and Russia.

On Monday, the White House said it would request $54 billion more in military spending for next year. That increase alone is roughly the size of the entire annual military budget of the United Kingdom, the fifth-largest spending country, and it’s more than 80 percent of Russia’s entire military budget in 2015.

If Congress were to follow Trump’s blueprint, the U.S. military budget could account for nearly 40 percent of global military spending next year. The U.S. would be outspending Russia by a margin of greater than 9 to 1.

 

 

 

Alex Emmons is a reporter covering national security, foreign affairs, human rights, and politics. Prior to joining The Intercept, he worked for Amnesty International and the ACLU on their campaigns against targeted killing, mass surveillance, and Guantánamo Bay.

 
 

Full story … 

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

Liberal War Addiction

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Lady%20Liberty.jpg

Peter Levelle, RT 

  • 24 Feb, 2017  | For many, we live in a world turned upside down. Traditional political divides are now blurry, and traditional political labels rendered meaningless. Today it’s liberalism that shows itself to be intolerant and decidedly pro-war. CrossTalking with Sara Flounders, John Walsh, and Mohammad Marandi.
  • Related: John Pilger | Obama’s Legacy–One of The Most Violent Presidents

Peter Levelle: American journalist, host of CrossTalk, a current affairs debate television program on RT

Full story (video) ... 

Related:

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Donate%20Now%20%28Green%29.jpg Journalism with real independence and integrity is a rare thing. All reader supported Evergreene Digest relies - exclusively!- on reader donations. Click on the donation button above to make a contribution and support our work.

John Pilger | Obama’s Legacy–One of The Most Violent Presidents, John Pilger, Dandelion Salad

https://c4.staticflickr.com/4/3064/2398383691_befcd81881_o.jpg IImage by Ben Salter via Flickr

Renowned journalist, film-maker and author John Pilger gives RT his view on the future of US-Russia relations.

January 16, 2017 |  Renowned journalist, film-maker and author John Pilger gives RT his view on the future of US-Russia relations.

John Pilger: Renowned journalist, film-maker and author 

Full story (video) … 

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

 

Challenging Klobuchar on Ukraine War

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Foreign%20Policy%20Banner.jpg

As Democrats compete to become the new War Party – pushing for a dangerous confrontation with nuclear-armed Russia – some constituents are objecting, as Mike Madden did in a letter to Sen. Amy Klobuchar.

Mike Madden (of St. Paul, Minnesota), Consortiumnews.com

http://www.evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/twitter-4-512.png Now you can follow Evergreene Digest on Twitter.

 


Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesotahttps://consortiumnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/AJK_Twitter-1-300x300.jpg

February 19, 2017 | Dear Senator Klobuchar, I write with concern over statements you have made recently regarding Russia. These statements have been made both at home and abroad, and they involve two issues; the alleged Russian hack of the presidential election and Russia’s actions in the aftermath of the February 22, 2014 coup in Kiev.

U.S. intelligence services allege that President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign to denigrate Hillary Clinton and help elect Donald Trump. The campaign is purported to include the production of fake news, cyber-trolling, and propaganda from Russian state-owned media. It is also alleged that Russia hacked the email accounts of the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, subsequently providing the emails to WikiLeaks.

Full story … 

Related:

http://media.cagle.com/228/2017/01/15/190166_600.jpg  The Dangers of Democratic Party's Putin-bashing after German Intel Cleared Russia on Election Interference, Compiled by David Culver, Ed., Evergreene Digest 

  • Part 1: German Intel Clears Russia on Interference
  • Mainstream U.S. media only wants stories of Russian perfidy, so when German intelligence cleared Moscow of suspected subversion of German democracy, the silence was deafening, says ex-CIA analyst Ray McGovern.
  • Part 2: Dangers of Democratic Putin-Bashing
  • Exclusive: As national Democratic leaders continue to blame Russian President Putin for their 2016 defeat, they’re leading their party into a realignment with the neocons and other war hawks.

###

The Fast Track to Armageddon, Louis René Beres, US News

Could President Trump propel a nuclear war in the Middle East?

 

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

 

The Fast Track to Armageddon

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Foreign%20Policy%20Banner.jpg

Could President Trump propel a nuclear war in the Middle East?

Louis René Beres, US News 

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Reader%20Supported%20News%20donate%20graphic.jpgIf you like reading this article, consider joining the crew of all reader-supported Evergreene Digest by contributing the equivalent of a cafe latte a month--using the donation button in the above right-hand corner—so we can bring you more just like it.



 

http://evergreenedigest.org/sites/evergreenedigest.org/files/Bomb%20with%20US%20Flag.jpg "He's going to get us all killed." --Michael Moore

Feb. 10, 2017 | "Should the enemy make a mistake, our roaring missiles will rain down on them." – IRGC Iran Air Force Commander, General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, Feb. 4, 2017

When all pertinent factors are taken into account, U.S. President Donald Trump could sometime undertake more-or-less selective military action against Iran. In response, the Islamic Republic – then having absolutely no meaningful option to launching at least certain forms of armed reprisal – would target American military forces in the region and/or carefully chosen Israeli targets. Whatever its precise configuration of selected targets, Tehran's retaliatory blow would be expressly designed so as not to elicit an unacceptably massive (possibly even nuclear) counter-retaliation. With particular regard to Israel, moreover, this sort of retaliation would plausibly include, inter alia, a substantial reliance upon Iran's own surrogate militia forces in Hezbollah.

All such bewildering calculations, of course, must assume perfect rationality on all sides. If, for example, the new American president should cast all caution to the winds with his own first strike (a strike that would be defended by Washington, in law, as an allegedly legitimate expression of international law-enforcement, or "anticipatory self-defense"), the Iranian response, whether rational or irrational, could expectedly be "proportionate" – that is, comparably massive. In that prospectively escalatory case, any contemplated introduction of nuclear weapons into the ensuing conflagration might not necessarily be dismissed out of hand.

Louis René Beres, Contributor, US News

Full story … 

http://everydayfeminism.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PlsShareArrow5.png

 

Pages