You are here

Race & Ethnicity

Race & Ethnicity

The Racism of Blood and Guts Palin

    \r\n
  • Episode Three of Sarah Palin’s Alaska makes Sarah’s flub on North Korea this week (Nov 21-27) entirely understandable.
  • \r\n

  • Sarah Palin's Brand of 'Feminism' More Popular With Men Than Women
  • \r\n

\r\n

Billy Wharton, Bronx County Independent Examiner | NY

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cuppa jove to Evergreene Digest--using the donation button in the above right-hand corner—so we can bring you more just like it.

Episode Three of Sarah Palin’s Alaska makes Sarah’s flub on North Korea this week (Nov 21-27) entirely understandable.  Who has time to understand such geopolitical complexities when there are so many “life lessons” to impart to your children?  This, as well as providing enough proof that far-right Conservatives really aren’t the racists they are made out to be, took up most of the episode.  Kim Il Jong be damned!

\r\n

The Blood, The Blood, The Blood

\r\n

It is hard to determine which show is bloodier, Sarah Palin’s Alaska or AMC’s The Walking Dead.  Sure the zombie flick features busted heads and constant blood splatters, but each Palin episode includes a ritual fish kill with full dissections.  Last week, the fish guillotine, this week the bloody fish table.  The blood is everywhere, on everything and is offered to the viewer as evidence of what Alaska is all about.

\r\n

More...

\r\n

Related:

\r\n

Sarah Palin's Brand of 'Feminism' More Popular With Men Than WomenAdele M. Stan, AlterNet
Palin peddles a shallow narcissism dressed in 'empowering' feminist language.

Section(s): 

Maddow: Fox Uses 'Flagrantly Bogus Stories' to Provoke White Racism

MSNBC's Rachel Maddow called out Fox News for its role in promoting reports about Shirley Sherrod and ACORN that proved to be distorted.

David Edwards and Muriel Kane  Raw Story/AlterNet

\r\n

MSNBC's Rachel Maddow called out Fox News on Thursday (July 22) for its role in promoting reports about Shirley Sherrod and ACORN that proved to be distorted. She charged that the network "continually campaigns on flagrantly bogus stories designed to make white Americans fear black Americans."

\r\n

"I showed up in the weirdest place last night," Maddow began. "I was on The O'Reilly Factor. It was very spooky."

\r\n

When Maddow accused Fox during her appearance on Bill O'Reilly's program of playing an active role in "the fake ACORN controversy," the show's host responded by sneering that Fox "kick[s] your network's butt every single night."

\r\n

More...

Section(s): 

One Year Later, Arizona Law Keeps Families from Getting Public Benefits

\r\n

One year after it became law, a measure created to fight alleged fraud committed by undocumented immigrants applying for public benefits, is hurting those who actually qualify for the services.

Valeria Fernández, New America Media

\r\n


At a time when corporations are buying up elections – not to mention the 24-hour-news cycle – help ensure that a source for truly independent journalism lives on. Support Evergreene Digest today by using the donation button in the above right-hand corner.

\r\n

One year after it became law, a measure created to fight alleged fraud committed by undocumented immigrants applying for public benefits, is hurting those who actually qualify for the services.

HB 2008 went into effect on Nov. 24, 2009, requiring state agencies, cities and government employees in Arizona to report to immigration authorities anyone they considered to be in the country illegally. Under the law, government workers could face up to four months in jail if they fail to report someone.

Unlike SB 1070, another controversial law aimed at making undocumented immigrants subject to incarceration, there was no public debate on HB 2008. It was approved quietly as part of budget negotiations by conservative Republicans including Rep. Senator Russell Pearce, and signed by Gov. Jan Brewer.

More...

Section(s): 

Racism Is Hardly a Thing of the Past

    \r\n
  • Is Jim Crow back? Are African Americans, particularly African American men, once more suffering systematic discrimination on the basis of race -- a discrimination that locks them out of equal rights and basic citizenship?
  • \r\n

  • Listen to the hard logic offered by Michelle Alexander, a law professor and author of The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in an Age of Colorblindness.
  • \r\n

\r\n

Rev. Jesse Jackson, Huffington Post

\r\n

Mr. Fish

\r\n

Is Jim Crow back? Are African Americans, particularly African American men, once more suffering systematic discrimination on the basis of race -- a discrimination that locks them out of equal rights and basic citizenship?

\r\n

The question is incendiary -- and seems unreal. This is the post-racial America, where an African American can be elected president. Overt expression of racism is no longer socially acceptable. So, how could anyone allege the revival of Jim Crow laws, the laws that locked blacks into a permanent underclass under segregation?

\r\n

Listen to the hard logic offered by Michelle Alexander, a law professor and author of The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in an Age of Colorblindness. Professor Alexander makes the following points:
• More African Americans are under correctional control today -- in prison or jail, on probation or parole -- than were enslaved in 1850, a decade before the Civil War began.
• More black men were disenfranchised in 2004 than in 1870, the year the 15th Amendment was ratified, prohibiting laws that explicitly deny the right to vote on the basis of race.
• More than half of working-age African-American men in major urban areas -- according to one report, as much as 80 percent in Chicago -- have criminal records and are thus subject to legalized discrimination.

\r\n

More...

Section(s): 

Arizona Legalizes Racial Profiling


\r\n

Arizona's new immigration legislation - requiring law enforcement officers to stop everyone whom they have “reasonable suspicion” to believe is an undocumented immigrant and arrest them if they fail to produce their papers - demeans us all by effectively legalizing racial profiling.

Marjorie Cohn, Jurist

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cuppa jove to Evergreene Digest--using the donation button in the above right-hand corner—so we can bring you more just like it.

The conservative “states’ rights” mantra sweeping our country has led to one of the most egregious wrongs in recent U.S. history. New legislation in Arizona requires law enforcement officers to stop everyone whom they have “reasonable suspicion” to believe is an undocumented immigrant and arrest them if they fail to produce their papers. What constitutes “reasonable suspicion”? When asked what an undocumented person looks like, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, who signed SB 1070 into law last week, said, “I don’t know what an undocumented person looks like.” The bill does not prohibit police from relying on race or ethnicity in deciding who to stop. It is unlikely that officers will detain Irish or German immigrants to check their documents. This law unconstitutionally criminalizes “walking while brown” in Arizona.

Former Arizona attorney general Grant Woods explained to Brewer that SB 1070 would vest too much discretion in the state police and lead to racial profiling and expensive legal fees for the state. But the governor evidently succumbed to racist pressure as she faces a reelection campaign. Woods said, “[Brewer] really felt that the majority of Arizonans fall on the side of, ‘Let’s solve the problem and not worry about the Constitution.’” The polls Brewer apparently relied on, however, employed questionable methodology and were conducted before heavy media coverage of the controversial legislation. No Democrats and all but one Republican Arizona legislator voted for SB 1070.

More...

Section(s): 

Pages