You are here

Religion & Spirituality

Religion & Spirituality Logo

Bothering to Love: One Priest's Modest Proposal for Lent

In the Gospels Jesus says, "It is mercy I desire, not sacrifice." Here's a novel idea for Lent: why not take Jesus at his word?

Rev. James Martin, S.J., Huffington Post

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cuppa jove to Evergreene Digest--using the donation button above—so we can bring you more just like it.

What have you given up for Lent?

That's what many Christians--from almost every denomination, and especially Roman Catholics--are asking one another this time of year. The most common thing to forego, I would wager, is some kind of food: soda and chocolate seem to be the Most Favored Sacrifices, with cigarettes and liquor running a close third. Each year, in fact, a Jewish friend from my college days calls me on Ash Wednesday to tell me what to give up, since he thinks my deciding on my own is too easy. Last year it was chicken wings, which was harder than you might think. (I'll save the story of how he came to assign my abstinence for another time.)

Fasting originated as a way of saving money on food, so that Christians could give it to the poor. It had a practical end: no meat for you meant more money for those who couldn't afford meat. Giving things up also reminds you that you don't always have to give into your appetites. It reminds you of your ability to exert self-control. And it reminds you of the poor, who go without every day, Lent or not. The Dutch spiritual writer and Catholic priest Henri Nouwen summed it up nicely: "For now, it seems that some fasting is the best way to remind myself of the millions who are hungry and to purify my heart and mind for a decision that does not exclude them."

More...

While 3M's CEO blusters, a volunteer inspires

  • Nothing like easy ideological scapegoats to distract, divide and manipulate a fast-eroding American middle class into yelling at each other over whom to blame for the Great Recession.
  • I thought the likes of Houdini or David Copperfield were the ultimate sleight-of-hand masters. They don't hold a candle to Buckley and his modern-day ilk.

Rubén Rosario, St. Paul Pioneer Press | MN

Thanks to Evergreene Digest reader Jogues Epple for this contribution

Chef Rachel Bethke, left, a Minnesota native, who is working as a volunteer for the Mercy Ship charity group. (Courtesy photo)

George Buckley, 3M's chief executive, called President Barack Obama "anti-business" recently.

"We're not indentured servants, and we will do business where it's good and friendly. If it's hostile, incrementally, things will slip away," Buckley said in an interview with the London-based Financial Times. "We've got a choice between manufacturing in Canada and Mexico — which tend to be pro-business — or America."

More...

What Would Jesus Cut?


Tim, Hannah, Elizabeth, Duane, and the rest of the Sojourners team.

This article is made possible with the generous contributions of readers like you. Thank you!

Right now Congress is considering a budget plan that would make a 9 percent cut in discretionary spending while giving a 2 percent increase for military spending. This would be devastating for domestic programs that provide basic nutrition, health, and opportunity to poor children and international aid programs that save lives every day.

As a country, we face difficult financial choices, but one thing that should not be on the table is to abandon the poor and vulnerable while allowing more military spending.

Tell Congress to get its budget priorities in order.

As Christians we ask ourselves, “What would Jesus do?” to make sure our actions reflect our deepest held values. So when it comes to decisions about our national budget, we ask, “What would Jesus cut?”

Military and defense spending make up over half of the federal discretionary budget. If instead of a 2 percent increase the defense budget took a 2 percent cut, it would save almost $10 billion this year(1).

The biblical prophets make clear that a nation’s righteousness is ultimately determined not by its GNP or military might -- but by how it treats its most vulnerable people. Jesus says our love for him will be demonstrated by how we treat the “least of these.”

Urge your legislators to remember our moral priorities when they vote on the budget.

We can’t move backwards on programs proven to work: international aid targeted at empowering women; vaccines and bed nets combating deadly diseases; school lunch programs and early childhood education that give poor children the opportunity to thrive; tax credits that reward work and help stabilize families. These are dollars we can’t afford not to invest.

In Great Britain, Prime Minister Cameron made the choice to delay a costly nuclear submarine program while also increasing funding for international aid. We can do the same(2).  

As we have all learned from the Great Recession, our economic choices matter. We must make financial decisions based on our values and not just short-term goals. We must remind our members of Congress to remember what is at stake when they decide what to fund and what to cut.

Before the budget vote in early March, the military-industrial complex will have lobbyists fighting for every dollar they can get. As people of faith, we need to speak out for the poor and for programs that support the common good.

In appreciation for your advocacy,

1.) Horney, James R. "House GOP Plan Cuts Non-Security Discretionary Programs 15 Percent Through End of Fiscal Year." Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 4 Feb. 2011.
2.) "Top 10 Fiscally Responsible Defense Cuts." Center for American Progress. 2 Feb. 2011

Related:

Anti-Austerity Alliance Wins in Illinois, David Moberg, In These Times

  • A 300-member coalition helps raise taxes to save essential services.
  • The Responsible Budget Coalition’s victory ‘provides a model for organizing,’ says Jeff Blum, executive director of USAction. ‘We can’t just be defensive.’
  • Austerity - a sure path to a bad economy
  • Citizens must be better educated about U.S. economic options

Liberal & Progressive Jews Support the Egyptian Uprising

Rabbi Michael Lerner, editor of Tikkun Magazine and chair of The Tikkun Community, affirmed today (Feb. 1, 2011) that there is a growing upsurge of support for the Egyptian Uprising in the Jewish community.

Rabbi Michael Lerner, Aljazeera

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cuppa jove to Evergreene Digest--using the donation button above—so we can bring you more just like it.

Jews recount at Passover their own history with the Pharaoh of Egypt - sympathies to the current Egyptian struggle run deep [Getty]

Rabbi Lerner issued the following statement:

Ever since the victory over the dictator of Tunisia and the subsequent uprising in Egypt, my email has been flooded with messages from Jews around the world hoping and praying for the victory of the Egyptian people over their cruel Mubarak regime.

Though a small segment of Jews have responded to right-wing voices from Israel that lament the change and fear that a democratic government would bring to power fundamentalist extremists who wish to destroy Israel and who would abrogate the hard-earned treaty that has kept the peace between Egypt and Israel for the last 30 years, the majority of Jews are more excited and hopeful than worried.

More...

Budget Cuts and Bad Faith

The moral test of any society is how it treats its poorest and most vulnerable citizens. And that is exactly what the Bible says, over and over again.

Jim Wallis, Sojourners

This article is made possible with the generous contributions of readers like you. Thank you!

House Republicans announced a plan yesterday (Feb 9) to cut $43 billion in domestic spending and international aid, while increasing spending for military and defense by another $8 billion. This proposal comes just months after billions of dollars were added to the deficit with an extension of tax cuts to the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans. House Republicans focused in on only 12 percent of federal spending, and targeted things like education, the environment, food safety, law enforcement, infrastructure, and transportation -- programs that benefit or protect most Americans. They also proposed cutting funding for programs that benefit the most vulnerable members of our society, such as nutrition programs for our poorest women and children. We don't yet know all the cuts Republicans are targeting in their proposals, but it's good to finally know what their priorities are.

Under the proposed budget cuts, deficit reduction will not come from the super-rich; it will come from the rest of us. And the poorer you are, the more vulnerable you become, and the more you will pay for the burdens of deficit reduction. For example, Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), a program that helps provide food to hungry mothers and their children faces a $758 million cut. Also, the proposed budget cuts $544 million in international food aid grants for organizations such as World Vision. AmeriCorps, a program that provides public service opportunities for our young adults, would be eliminated entirely. But our military and defense budget, which sends our young adults off to kill and be killed, would receive an $8 billion increase.

More...

Pages